AC Chat: 2018-11-14 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call
- Yesim Saglam
- Aleksey Khapchenko
Yesim Nazlar: (11/14/2018 15:12) Welcome to the At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call taking place on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 at 13:00 UTC.
Yesim Nazlar: (15:12) Agenda: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/RfnvBQ
Evin Erdogdu: (15:44) Hello all, welcome and special thanks to those joining from IGF!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (@clo3): (15:51) Hi all
John Laprise: (15:54) Good morning
Yesim Nazlar: (15:54) Welcome all!
Marita Moll: (15:57) Hello all. I will only be able to stay for the first hour. Have to jump to a WT5 call after that. Did my slides arrive?
John Laprise: (15:57) sound good
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (@clo3): (15:58) Yes I too will be heading to the WT5 call
Yesim Nazlar: (15:58) @Marita: Your slides are received
Holly Raiche: (15:58) Did Jonathan forward my slides?
Yesim Nazlar: (15:58) @Holly: yes, received your slides as well
Yrjö Länsipuro: (15:58) Hello, greetings from the IGF
Jonathan Zuck: (15:59) Bon Jour mes amis!
Marita Moll: (16:00) Et bonjoiur à toi aussi Jonathan.
Joanna Kulesza 2: (16:01) Hi everyone!
Lilian Ivette De Luque: (16:02) Hi everyone
Marita Moll: (16:02) Is there any audio yet. I make it 8:02
Yesim Nazlar: (16:02) can't you hear Marita?
Marita Moll: (16:03) No, not hearing anything
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (@clo3): (16:05) Highly obstructive approach :-(
Marita Moll: (16:05) Okay, have some sound now
Yesim Nazlar: (16:06) @Marita: Glad it's solved
Bastiaan Goslings: (16:11) apologies for being late - connectivity issues
Yesim Nazlar: (16:12) Welcome Bastiaan
Sebastien: (16:13) +1 @ Bastiaan the same here
Jonathan Zuck: (16:15) there aren't any
John Laprise: (16:18) I am unhappy with the "veto" situation and I think these are shared. Maureen should consider having a word with her counterparts at the GNSO to relate our strong concerns.
Jonathan Zuck: (16:19) They don't care. We need to find other points of leverage.
John Laprise: (16:20) Then we need to write joint advice with the GAC to the Board
Hadia Elminiawi: (16:20) may I please receive dial out
Alan Greenberg: (16:20) @Jonathan, I agree. A word with their leaders will only reinforce that we don't understand their position.
Yesim Nazlar: (16:20) @Hadia: dialing out to you now
Hadia Elminiawi: (16:24) I just wanted to mention we are not losing it is rather a partial success - we still could come up with good recommendations, we still require more input and feedback to act upon and the public comments received in this regard are crucial and cannot be ignored so be ready folks for that
Jonathan Zuck: (16:25) Makes sense @Hadia
Evin Erdogdu: (16:26) Thank you for the presentation @Marita
Jonathan Zuck: (16:27) because even a parked page would be subject to those restrictions
Jonathan Zuck: (16:27) subject to contract compliance efforts
Jonathan Zuck: (16:29) do pics cross ownership booundries?
Holly Raiche: (16:29) Putting something in the actual contract makes sense - because it enforceable by Compliance
Joanna Kulesza 2: (16:29) +1
Jonathan Zuck: (16:30) that's an interesting campaign generally
Alan Greenberg: (16:30) I think the "panel" should be used if there is a claim of misuse of a city name counter to the contractual terms.
Jonathan Zuck: (16:31) at large. but YES.
Yrjö Länsipuro: (16:32) Yes, let's try to involve as many as possible of those 27
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (@clo3): (16:32) That is a perennial problem of course Marita anything that can be done will be geat
Justine Chew: (16:32) Metrics! ;)
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (@clo3): (16:33) Singing my song @Justine :-)
Jonathan Zuck: (16:33) You KNOW I'm supportive of metrics. Metrics Man!
Jonathan Zuck: (16:43) unfortunately not . the "ultimate" disposition tends towards genericds because of economics
Lilian Ivette De Luque: (16:44) my apologies I must retire I have a medical appointment just at this time. good rest of day
Jonathan Zuck: (16:44) it's more about making it a little less risky to try to create a niche tld
Jonathan Zuck: (16:45) and there's money involved...
Jonathan Zuck: (16:45) indeed
Alan Greenberg: (16:52) Re accuracy: yes in the 2013 RAA, but with a *HUGE* gap (Huge = about 180 million registration)
Yrjö Länsipuro: (16:57) Leaving to join the WT5 call
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (@clo3): (16:58) Sorry I need to disconnect now to join the SubPro WT5 call... re next meeting please check other meetings scheduled to avoid clash and overlap where possible.... Bye for now
Marita Moll: (16:59) Going to have to leave. Thanks for a good call.
Hadia Elminiawi: (16:59) Bye yryo and cheryl
Hadia Elminiawi: (16:59) sorry bye Yrjö
Hadia Elminiawi: (16:59) thank you Marita
Jonathan Zuck: (17:00) FINALLY GDPR is helpful in some way!
Joanna Kulesza 2: (17:00) +1 @John
John Laprise: (17:00) :)
A-Eduardo Diaz: (17:01) Need to go too!
Joanna Kulesza 2: (17:02) The EU practice has always been to put a due diligence obligation on data controlers, also they need to infomr the data subject if they get their data from anyone else (less to note that noone is allowed to share third party date)
Bastiaan Goslings: (17:02) thanks a lot, Holly!
Joanna Kulesza 2: (17:02) again - not picking a fight, just sharing my thoughts here
Joanna Kulesza 2: (17:03) +1 for Google docs!:)
Sebastien: (17:03) bye
Holly Raiche 2: (17:03) Hopefully, people will also look at the wiki as well
Sebastien: (17:04) CLosing session at IGF starting
Hadia Elminiawi: (17:04) bye Sebastien
Alan Greenberg: (17:04) ALso 1300 vs 1400
Justine Chew: (17:05) Do a poll?
Alan Greenberg: (17:05) Those in south are now 2 hours off and those on equator in the middle!
Alan Greenberg: (17:06) That was what I was saying.
Hadia Elminiawi: (17:06) bye all
Alan Greenberg: (17:07) If people feel we are fulfilling our obligation by just 1 hour per week meeting, they are wrong.
John Laprise: (17:07) bye
Evin Erdogdu: (17:07) Thank you all!
Gordon Chillcott: (17:07) Thanks and bye for now.