2020-04-01 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call
- Michelle DeSmyter
- Aleksey Khapchenko
- Evin Erdogdu (Deactivated)
Wednesday, 01 April 2020
Time: 20:00 - 21:30 UTC (for the time in various time zones click here)
How can I participate in this meeting?
English Conference ID = 3535
French Conference ID = 8585
Spanish Conference ID = 1738
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566
RTT Link: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN [streamtext.net]
Action Items: EN
Recording: EN, ES, FR
Zoom Chat: EN
Transcript: EN, ES, FR
Participants:
EN: Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Jonathan Zuck, Kaili Kan, Maureen Hilyard, Vernatius Ezeama, Gopal T.V., Joan Katambi, Alan Greenberg, Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Abdias Zambrano, Adrian Schmidt, Alfredo Calderon, Avri Doria, Bill Jouris, Christopher Wilkinson, Dave Kissoondoyal, Gordon Chillcott, Gunela Astbrink, Hadia Eliminiawi, Hanan Khatib, Haroun Mahamat Cherif, Holly Raiche, Jose Lebron, Judith Hellerstein, Justine Chew, Joan Katambi, Laurin Weissinger, Lutz Donnerhacke, Marita Moll, Matthias Hudobnik, Michel Tchonang, Omir Kerry Kerr, Raymond Mamattah, Ricardo Holmquist, Roberto Gaetano, Sarah Kiden, Seun Ojedeji, Sebastien Bachollet, Yrjo Lansipuro, Zak Muscovitch, Natalia Filina, Eduardo Diaz, Greg Shatan, Oksana Pryhodko, Narine Khachatryan, Chokri Ben Rodhane, Glenn McKnight,
ES: Alberto Soto, Harold Arcos,
FR: Michel Tchonang Linze, Anne-Marie Joly Bachollet,
Apologies: Shreedeep Rayamajhi, Joanna Kulesza, Vanda Scartezini, Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Aris Ignacio
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Herb Waye, Evin Erdoğdu, Claudia Ruiz
ES Interpreters: David and Marina
FR Interpreters: Aurélie and Camila
Call Management: Claudia Ruiz
At-Large Policy Resources
At-Large Capacity Building Workshop - An Introduction to Policy Development at ICANN
2020 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
At-Large Policy Summary
At-Large Executive Summary page
Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
EPDP Resources
Web Page of EPDP
EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
Keep Up with EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
EPDP Background Documents
AGENDA
Click tabs for languages - Haga clic en pestañas para idiomas - Cliquez sur les onglets pour les langues
English (EN)
1. Welcome and intro- staff (2 minutes)
2. Adoption of agenda, review of Action Items from 25 March - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutes)
3. Presentation on PDP 3.0 - Cheryl Langdon-Orr (20 minutes)
4. EPDP Phase II Update - Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg (15 minutes)
5. SubPro Updates - Justine Chew & Small Team (10 minutes)
See: SubPro Updates Workspace for Updates to Issues/Topics under Deliberation by the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG
Ongoing work by Small Team: Development of At-Large's Preliminary Scorecard on SubPro, inter alia for intersessional ALAC-GAC cooperation and At-Large participation in the GAC Focus Group on Subsequent Procedures
5.1 Update on Way Forward
5.2 For comment: At-Large Scorecard Topic List, 23 March 2020
5.3 For comment (also available at the SubPro Updates Workspace)
| At-Large Cross-Cutting Topics | Overarching Topics | Foundational Issues Topics | Application Submission Topics | Application Evaluation/Criteria Topics | String Contention Resolution Topics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. Geonames - subject to single purpose call discussion | 3. Cost vs Benefit (Continuing Subsequent Procedures) v2 |
6. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu and all (35 minutes)
Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2
For all recommendations not listed in the ALAC statement, the ALAC noted that they they “Support as written”. The ALAC “supported wording with change” for several other recommendations - 1, 6, 7, 9, 15, 19 - and made a general comment that differentiation between natural and legal persons would offload the system from unnecessary queries that are permissible under GDPR.
Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report
The ALAC noted that ensuring the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS is arguably ICANN's single most important role. The ALAC has a particular interest in the recommendations related to DNS Abuse, and notes that several of the recommendations overlap with and complement those issued by the RDS WHOIS2-RT and the CCT RT. DNS Security, stability and resiliency is not something that we can afford to ignore.
The ALAC has a particular focus on and interest in DNS Abuse. To address this may require contractual changes to facilitate Contractual Compliance action. Such changes require either negotiations with the contracted parties or a PDP, and the ALAC recommends against a PDP and instead encourages ICANN to come to an agreement with contracted parties. Known vulnerabilities need to be corrected with the utmost haste.
ALAC Feedback to PIR Public Comment Proceeding
Note: Not an ICANN Public Comment. The Public Interest Registry (PIR) held a Public Comment proceeding on the issue of the ISOC/PIR. (8) responses were submitted on behalf the ALAC to the PIR Public Comment proceeding.
The ALAC made several suggestions to PIR regarding the issue of ISOC/PIR. The ALAC noted that PICs are the best mechanism with which to enshrine the essential characteristics of a .ORG registry, yet there are significant issues with PIC enforcement that need to be addressed for PICs to be considered a trustworthy assurance. They noted that from the standpoint of an "individual end user," a 10 annual price cap would add a lot of predictability. The ALAC also noted that the stewardship council for .ORG is a good start, but its mandate should be wider than just free speech and privacy, and suggested a few board seats reserved for 501c(3) organizations, chosen by the community, would be more powerful. Reserving certain seats to be selected by NPOC and perhaps the ALAC (to represent the individual registrants) would help a great deal.
The ALAC’s objective is to enshrine PIR's best practices in its contract with ICANN such that they survive any further transitions of ownership.
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget,
The ALAC congratulated the ICANN Finance and Planning team, as the draft plans and budget have shown great improvement over the past few years. Not only in how the information is provided, but in the way the plans and budget are structured. The ALAC made several suggestions with regards to the Operating & Financial Plan and Budget, emphasizing that there is not an exact correlation between the number of domains and the income of ICANN. This is important because ICANN relies upon the number of contracted registries and registrars and the number of domains a gTLD has.
The ALAC drafted a separate response to Appendix C, relating to the Evolution of the Multistakeholder Model, following their statement. The At-Large community registered its surprise and disappointment at seeing this important subject, which has been such a major topic of discussion, now relegated to an appendix in this Public Comment - in which it is unlikely to get the time and attention it deserves from the ICANN community.
Addendum to the Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2
Guidelines for Developing Reference Label Generation Rules (LGRs) for the Second Level Version 2
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements |
| VOTE | |
Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 |
| VOTE | |
| COMMENT | ||
| DRAFTING | Drafting team volunteer(s): | |
| Phase 1 Initial Report of the Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Policy Development Process |
| DRAFTING |
6. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and all (3 minutes)
- Take the At-Large GeoNames Survey (deadline: 30 April)
7. Next Meeting - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and staff (2 minutes)
Español (ES)
1. Bienvenida y asistencia - staff (2 minutos)
2. Adopcion de la Agenda, revision de los Acciones a partir del 25 de marzo - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutos)
3. Presentación en PDP 3.0 - Cheryl Langdon-Orr (20 minutos)
Presentación: Diapositivas de Google
Referencia: Informe final del PDP
4. Actualización de la Fase II del EPDP - Hadia Elminiawi y Alan Greenberg (15 minutos)
5. Actualizaciones de SubPro - Justine Chew & Pequeño equipo (10 minutos)
Ver: SubPro Updates Workspace para actualizaciones de temas / temas bajo deliberación por los procedimientos posteriores PDP WG
Trabajo en curso de Pequeño equipo (Small Team): Desarrollo del cuadro de mando preliminar de At-Large en SubPro, entre otras cosas para la cooperación entre sesiones ALAC-GAC y la participación de At-Large en el Grupo de enfoque del GAC sobre procedimientos posteriores
5.1 Actualización sobre el camino a seguir
5.2 Para comentarios: At-Large Scorecard Topic List, 23 March 2020
5.3 Para comentarios (también disponible en SubPro Updates Workspace)
| At-Large Cross-Cutting Topics | Overarching Topics | Foundational Issues Topics | Application Submission Topics | Application Evaluation/Criteria Topics | String Contention Resolution Topics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. Geonames - subject to single purpose call discussion | 3. Cost vs Benefit (Continuing Subsequent Procedures) v2 |
6. Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu y todos (35 minutos)
Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC
Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2
For all recommendations not listed in the ALAC statement, the ALAC noted that they they “Support as written”. The ALAC “supported wording with change” for several other recommendations - 1, 6, 7, 9, 15, 19 - and made a general comment that differentiation between natural and legal persons would offload the system from unnecessary queries that are permissible under GDPR.
Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report
The ALAC noted that ensuring the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS is arguably ICANN's single most important role. The ALAC has a particular interest in the recommendations related to DNS Abuse, and notes that several of the recommendations overlap with and complement those issued by the RDS WHOIS2-RT and the CCT RT. DNS Security, stability and resiliency is not something that we can afford to ignore.
The ALAC has a particular focus on and interest in DNS Abuse. To address this may require contractual changes to facilitate Contractual Compliance action. Such changes require either negotiations with the contracted parties or a PDP, and the ALAC recommends against a PDP and instead encourages ICANN to come to an agreement with contracted parties. Known vulnerabilities need to be corrected with the utmost haste.
ALAC Feedback to PIR Public Comment Proceeding
Note: Not an ICANN Public Comment. The Public Interest Registry (PIR) held a Public Comment proceeding on the issue of the ISOC/PIR. (8) responses were submitted on behalf the ALAC to the PIR Public Comment proceeding.
The ALAC made several suggestions to PIR regarding the issue of ISOC/PIR. The ALAC noted that PICs are the best mechanism with which to enshrine the essential characteristics of a .ORG registry, yet there are significant issues with PIC enforcement that need to be addressed for PICs to be considered a trustworthy assurance. They noted that from the standpoint of an "individual end user," a 10 annual price cap would add a lot of predictability. The ALAC also noted that the stewardship council for .ORG is a good start, but its mandate should be wider than just free speech and privacy, and suggested a few board seats reserved for 501c(3) organizations, chosen by the community, would be more powerful. Reserving certain seats to be selected by NPOC and perhaps the ALAC (to represent the individual registrants) would help a great deal.
The ALAC’s objective is to enshrine PIR's best practices in its contract with ICANN such that they survive any further transitions of ownership.
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget,
The ALAC congratulated the ICANN Finance and Planning team, as the draft plans and budget have shown great improvement over the past few years. Not only in how the information is provided, but in the way the plans and budget are structured. The ALAC made several suggestions with regards to the Operating & Financial Plan and Budget, emphasizing that there is not an exact correlation between the number of domains and the income of ICANN. This is important because ICANN relies upon the number of contracted registries and registrars and the number of domains a gTLD has.
The ALAC drafted a separate response to Appendix C, relating to the Evolution of the Multistakeholder Model, following their statement. The At-Large community registered its surprise and disappointment at seeing this important subject, which has been such a major topic of discussion, now relegated to an appendix in this Public Comment - in which it is unlikely to get the time and attention it deserves from the ICANN community.
Comentarios Publicos para decision
Addendum to the Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2
Guidelines for Developing Reference Label Generation Rules (LGRs) for the Second Level Version 2
Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)
Nombre del Comentario Público | Comentarios del Público Cerrar | Estado | Autor(es) |
|---|---|---|---|
Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements | VOTAR | ||
Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 | VOTAR | ||
Middle East and Adjoining Countries (MEAC) Strategy 2021-2025 | COMMENTARIO | Equipo de redacción voluntario(s): raymondselorm.mamattah (AFRALO) Dr. T.V. Gopal (APRALO) | |
Revised Community Travel Support Guidelines | REDACCIÓN | Equipo de redacción voluntario(s): | |
| Phase 1 Initial Report of the Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Policy Development Process |
| REDACCIÓN |
7. Otros temas (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond y todos (3 minutos)
- Realice la encuesta de GeoNames de At-Large (fecha límite: 30 de abril)
8. Próxima reunion - Olivier Crepin-Leblond y staff (2 minutos)
Français (FR)
1. Accueil et appel nominal - personnel (2 minutes)
2. Adoption de l'ordre du jour, examen des points d'action à partir du 25 mars - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutes)
3. Présentation sur PDP 3.0 - Cheryl Langdon-Orr (20 minutes)
4. Mise à jour EPDP Phase II - Hadia Elminiawi et Alan Greenberg (15 minutes)
5. Mises à jour SubPro - Justine Chew & petite équipe (10 minutes)
Voir: Espace de travail des mises à jour de SubPro pour les mises à jour des problèmes / rubriques sous délibération par le groupe de travail PDP sur les procédures ultérieures
Travaux en cours par une petite équipe: Élaboration du tableau de bord préliminaire d'At-Large sur SubPro, notamment pour la coopération intersessions ALAC-GAC et la participation d'At-Large au groupe de réflexion du GAC sur les procédures ultérieures.
5.1 Mise à jour sur la voie à suivre
5.2 Pour commentaire: At-Large Scorecard Topic List, 23 March 2020
5.3 Pour commentaire (également disponible à Espace de travail des mises à jour de SubPro)
| At-Large Cross-Cutting Topics | Overarching Topics | Foundational Issues Topics | Application Submission Topics | Application Evaluation/Criteria Topics | String Contention Resolution Topics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. Geonames - subject to single purpose call discussion | 3. Cost vs Benefit (Continuing Subsequent Procedures) v2 |
6. Mises à jour des commentaires sur la politique - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu et tous (35 minutes)
Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2
For all recommendations not listed in the ALAC statement, the ALAC noted that they they “Support as written”. The ALAC “supported wording with change” for several other recommendations - 1, 6, 7, 9, 15, 19 - and made a general comment that differentiation between natural and legal persons would offload the system from unnecessary queries that are permissible under GDPR.
Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR2) Review Team Draft Report
The ALAC noted that ensuring the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS is arguably ICANN's single most important role. The ALAC has a particular interest in the recommendations related to DNS Abuse, and notes that several of the recommendations overlap with and complement those issued by the RDS WHOIS2-RT and the CCT RT. DNS Security, stability and resiliency is not something that we can afford to ignore.
The ALAC has a particular focus on and interest in DNS Abuse. To address this may require contractual changes to facilitate Contractual Compliance action. Such changes require either negotiations with the contracted parties or a PDP, and the ALAC recommends against a PDP and instead encourages ICANN to come to an agreement with contracted parties. Known vulnerabilities need to be corrected with the utmost haste.
ALAC Feedback to PIR Public Comment Proceeding
Note: Not an ICANN Public Comment. The Public Interest Registry (PIR) held a Public Comment proceeding on the issue of the ISOC/PIR. (8) responses were submitted on behalf the ALAC to the PIR Public Comment proceeding.
The ALAC made several suggestions to PIR regarding the issue of ISOC/PIR. The ALAC noted that PICs are the best mechanism with which to enshrine the essential characteristics of a .ORG registry, yet there are significant issues with PIC enforcement that need to be addressed for PICs to be considered a trustworthy assurance. They noted that from the standpoint of an "individual end user," a 10 annual price cap would add a lot of predictability. The ALAC also noted that the stewardship council for .ORG is a good start, but its mandate should be wider than just free speech and privacy, and suggested a few board seats reserved for 501c(3) organizations, chosen by the community, would be more powerful. Reserving certain seats to be selected by NPOC and perhaps the ALAC (to represent the individual registrants) would help a great deal.
The ALAC’s objective is to enshrine PIR's best practices in its contract with ICANN such that they survive any further transitions of ownership.
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget,
The ALAC congratulated the ICANN Finance and Planning team, as the draft plans and budget have shown great improvement over the past few years. Not only in how the information is provided, but in the way the plans and budget are structured. The ALAC made several suggestions with regards to the Operating & Financial Plan and Budget, emphasizing that there is not an exact correlation between the number of domains and the income of ICANN. This is important because ICANN relies upon the number of contracted registries and registrars and the number of domains a gTLD has.
The ALAC drafted a separate response to Appendix C, relating to the Evolution of the Multistakeholder Model, following their statement. The At-Large community registered its surprise and disappointment at seeing this important subject, which has been such a major topic of discussion, now relegated to an appendix in this Public Comment - in which it is unlikely to get the time and attention it deserves from the ICANN community.
Commentaire public pour décision
Addendum to the Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – Phase 2
Guidelines for Developing Reference Label Generation Rules (LGRs) for the Second Level Version 2
Déclarations actuelles (avis, commentaires ou correspondance de l'ALAC)
Nom du Commentaire Public | Commentaire Public Fermer | Statut | Auteur(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
Draft Proposal for NextGen@ICANN Program Improvements |
| VOTE | |
Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) Study 1 |
| VOTE | |
| COMMENTAIRE | ||
| RÉDACTION | Bénévole(s) de l'équipe de rédaction: | |
| Phase 1 Initial Report of the Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Policy Development Process |
| RÉDACTION |
7. Toute autre affaire (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond et tous (3 minutes)
- Participez à l'enquête At-Large GeoNames (délai: 30 avril)