27 June 2016 - Helsinki
Participants: Alejandra Reynoso, Martin Boyle, Mirjana Tasic, David McAuley, Katrina Sataki, Stephen Deerhake, Maarten Simon, Dejan Djukic, Christelle Vaval, Ben Fuller
Staff: Bart Boswinkel, joke braeken, Sam Eisner
Guests: Lise Fuhr, Matthieu Weill
Apologies:
Agenda:
Recording:
Documents and presentations:
Chat transcript:
Joke Braeken: (6/27/2016 13:19) Hi everyone
Joke Braeken: (13:20) The ccNSO Guidelines Review Committee will start in about 10 minutes from now.
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:25) Hi Joke
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:26) Life good in ICANN?
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:30) oops, missed dial in - my computer went into mute :-(
Joke Braeken: (13:31) Hi Martin!
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:31) i can hear you over AC, but I missed the dial out
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:31) so I can't speak to you
Joke Braeken: (13:31) shall I try again?
Joke Braeken: (13:31) i will try now again
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:32) did you hear me?
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:33) I think I'm on the phone!
Joke Braeken: (13:36) Martin, i could not hear you
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:37) can't really test now, but my computer seems to think I'm on the phone
Joke Braeken: (13:38) If you want, I can "kill" the existing connection, and dial out again?
martin boyle, Nominet: (13:40) let's see if I need to talk
Joke Braeken: (13:40) ok
Joke Braeken: (13:57) Samantha Eisner just ended her update
Joke Braeken: (14:04) When submitting a question that you want me to read out loud on the microphone in this session, please provide your name and affiliation if you are representing one, start your sentence with <QUESTION> and end it with <QUESTION>. When submitting a comment that you want me to read out loud on the microphone, once again provide your name and affiliation if you have one then start your sentence with a <COMMENT> and end it with <COMMENT>. Text outside these quotes will be considered as part of “chat” and will not be read out loud on the mic.Any questions or comments provided outside of the session time will not be read aloud.
Joke Braeken: (14:08) Any questions from the remote participants to Sam?
Joke Braeken: (14:20) Sam Eisner is leaving the room
Joke Braeken: (14:31) Guideline ccNSO Actions regarding RZERC: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MuQ_GvG-DI3OMSGLNNrSTX4Z57GDCGntquoCaTYl9Vw/edit (link to the google doc)
Ben Fuller .na: (14:34) switch 'were' to 'are'
martin boyle, Nominet: (14:34) agree with David
martin boyle, Nominet: (14:35) both work for me
Joke Braeken: (14:42) no questions from remote participants?
Joke Braeken: (14:42) if not, we are wrapping up this meeting.
Joke Braeken: (14:43) thank you everyone for attending
Notes:
Notes 27 June meeting GRC
Simplified version of different decisions and internal documentation that need to be prepared
Aspects that need to be done after 1 October
As ICANN staff not how to do it
Identify decisions that need to be made
Highlevel decisions
Immediate CSC selection: already in place
Next item: New Bylaws
How to select the standing panel
September 2016
Obligation to consult with SO/AC in tender process
Once ICANN makes a call for consultation/ critical starting point
Key-date 1 October 2016
On that date:
New entity: Empowered Community
- ccNSO is decisional participant, opportunity to participate
- How to participate
- EC participation selected need for organization admin component, this group constituted by chairs or designated. Opportunity to select person. Who to place, Council decision
- On-going What kinds of guidance as it relates to EC
Need to have people there. Pass-through to community (point of contact)
No need to change to who Board members are: formal notice to restate Board members are
Formally designating those people to allow technical / legal mechanism in place
Review/member selection process reviews
AOC member selection process (specific reviews)
Method of selection will change. Once a review is initiated, SO/AC need to solicit candidates, make up rules for selection
Chair of SO/AC to make selection, guidance to
Nomination by SO/AC
One or two reviews kick-off
Provisional note
Priority item
Immediate and on-going
EC is mechanism for escalation mechanism
Petition, how can a petition be initiated
Rules on how to join other process. Different threshold for different things
Participation in community forums
Question how will ccNSO gather together for community
Decisions need to be make, Think through threshold, simple majority, super majority
Report back to empowered community
Each of the SO/AC will be doing the same things
A lot of granular point that need to be looked at.
Opportunities to make changes
There will be an opportunity in early 2017 to react on budget and ops plan.
Need to be prepared to how start a petition.
There are many other items
Staged out 1-2 years
CSC
After one (1) year charter CSC to be reviewed: ccNSO and GNSO to determine how CSC review needs to happen (by October 2017)
Years afterwards other reviews.
Stephen:
It is up to each SO/AC could come up with its own threshold. When drafting the bylaws.
Not in Proposal stick to proposal
Are there minimum’s to suggest.
David: CSC membership, non-g or ccTLD, not limited to ARPA, potential different operational
Any
Stephen: other .ARPA, Mil , or Gov?
EDU
Mathieu: Exciting times ahead, nothing prevents Council using existing procedures
Any requirement, in CCWG , question whether to make guidelines
Is this Council or Member vote.
Mapping procedures and decisions
Only relevant for ccNSO members or open to non-ccNSO members
In some cases all ccTLDs (members and non-members)
Requirement non-ccNSO member (ccTLD)
How to make agreement with GNSO?
Several ways: reasonable people
David: distinct entities with different mechanism
How to reach confirmation.
Stephan: In favor of proposal. More substantial
- This should not be overly complex
- David will put things together
Sam: There will be times when the community to bring IRP. Each group will be able to do so.
Community need to be brought together. How to ensure positions are aligned
Some discussion, around cross-community
Action: David /Stephan
Mapping procedures
Action: Bart
Check: critical points