/
AC Chat: 2018-08-29 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call

AC Chat: 2018-08-29 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (8/29/2018 15:10) Welcome to the At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call taking place on Wednesday, 29 August 2018 at 13:00 UTC

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (15:11) Agenda: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/fvTvBQ

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (15:52) Hello all!

Ā Ā Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (15:54) What you do is to carry lots of stuff within yourself.

Ā Ā Olivier MJ CrĆ©pin-Leblond: (15:57) yes I'll have lots of stuff in my pockets

Ā Ā Maureen Hilyard: (15:57) Good morning all

Ā Ā Gordon Chillcott: (15:57) Good morning.

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (15:58) Welcome all!

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (15:59) Lol @Olivier

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (16:00) Good morning everyone!!

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:01) Buenos dias, @Alberto!

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (16:02) Gracias Evin, perfecto your Spanish... btw , What is the telephone access code?

Ā Ā Alfredo Calderon: (16:03) Good morning, afternoon or evening to all!

Ā Ā Nadira AL-Araj: (16:03) Hi all,

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:05) 22 August CPWG Action Items: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/C-vvBQ

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:05) @Alberto the Adigo code is 3535

Ā Ā Joanna Kulesza: (16:06) Hi everyone, happy to be joining you.

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:06) Welcome, Joanna!

Ā Ā Sebastien: (16:08) edmon@dot.asia

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (16:09) @Ed, I can help you contact Don

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (16:09) Yes, we have been in touch with him.

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (16:09) Don isn't with APTLD any more OCL

Ā Ā Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (16:09) @Satish: Contact him and let me know when to join th ecall

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (16:09) Don is now with UASG

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (16:10) Ok @Ed

Ā Ā Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (16:10) Tnak you Sebastion

Ā Ā Alan Greenberg: (16:10) <don.hollander@icann.org>,

Ā Ā Maureen Hilyard: (16:11) Don is also available at don@i2.org.nz - personal email

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:11) Google Doc: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1agNhbXfXLPQIRTGjC-2D8U-2Dl534SWpbnsiapi-2Dfi5mzFw_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mrDeztziKLa7gZqGADzxcnHA3QXmXYsnChWYBR4NElI&m=UF1I1Ce1j7IJ1PCe3niWf2u1MmhDrOYU-bvFqvLImuo&s=6icNh6XShUjZinJ3iHvgc1uGiifXQ0lK9-zmLyHg85A&e=

Ā Ā Sebastien: (16:12) don.hollender@uasg.tech

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (16:12) They are so easliy confused with each other OCL ;-)

Ā Ā Maureen Hilyard: (16:12) Edmon can also be contacted at edmon@dot.asia but the registry address is his main address

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (16:14) :-)

Ā Ā Heidi Ullrich: (16:14) LOL

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (16:14) I shouldn't have told you ;-)

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:18) Thee has been a lot of discusson on the definition of community

Ā Ā Alan Greenberg: (16:18) Can we have a brief summary of substance of what we are saying?

Ā Ā Avri Doria: (16:21) how does an unorganized community apply for a gTLD?

Ā Ā Daniel Khauka Nanghaka: (16:22) Hello All

Ā Ā Alan Greenberg: (16:24) Two docs I will be talking about during the EPDP section: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_sac-2D102-2Den.pdf&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mrDeztziKLa7gZqGADzxcnHA3QXmXYsnChWYBR4NElI&m=UF1I1Ce1j7IJ1PCe3niWf2u1MmhDrOYU-bvFqvLImuo&s=ZeZ35yhaP9WCuRVeY8zQdiCE_INq6G52-1trrH21rTE&e=Ā Ā and https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_ssac2018-2D17-2D26jun18-2Den.pdf&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mrDeztziKLa7gZqGADzxcnHA3QXmXYsnChWYBR4NElI&m=UF1I1Ce1j7IJ1PCe3niWf2u1MmhDrOYU-bvFqvLImuo&s=q_TxQaDDHFPiAW37vbY40mg_xdHmyOjmPPGJr_b8a5o&e=

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:25) @ Avri - tha's the issue.Ā Ā In cnsideration of the first round, in looking a whether the applicant community got prioity, the definition was narrowly drawn.Ā Ā If we want a broader view of 'community' we need to come up with elements of a definition

Ā Ā Alan Greenberg: (16:28) @Marita, yes, prior existance, but to what with your example of smokers, how many of the world's smokers must you have worked with?

Ā Ā Marita Moll: (16:30) @alan -- perhaps that's a component we could work on

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:31) Will have to catchup on the earlier part of this call. Sorry, just came off another call.

Ā Ā Olivier MJ CrĆ©pin-Leblond: (16:31) Welcome Justine

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:32) Welcome Justine!

Ā Ā Maureen Hilyard: (16:32) Thanks for making yourself available for the call, Justine.

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (16:36) appologies for joing late

Ā Ā Evin Erdogdu: (16:36) Welcome, Hadia!

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (16:36) indeed Alan very important

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:37) The Category 1 and Category 2 designations?

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (16:37) we went through the list using Vol PICs as an important criteria (or the absence of any)

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:40) I don't think we'll debate this.Ā Ā The UDRP applies to those with an interest in the name.Ā Ā The members of the general public do not have standing to claim harm

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:41) I wasn't asking what they were .. I was asking whether the debate was in reference to those.

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:42) Not particularly, from me. Debate still going on

Ā Ā Marita Moll: (16:43) And I have not been working on that section

Ā Ā Olivier MJ CrĆ©pin-Leblond: (16:43) Thanks Justine and Marita

Ā Ā Marita Moll: (16:44) Deeper knowledge -- not on my side

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:45) What I will add in my response is the special category of PICs - which are dealt with by the GAC - which we supported (they have separate questions in the Subsequent Procedurres questions

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (16:46) no, sorry

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (16:46) ok

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (16:46) @Alberto: lowered your hand, fyi

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (16:46) Thanks Yesim

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (16:47) you're welcome!

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:47) Yes, let me think about it more and see how to work through the Asssessment in Rounds comment.

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:47) @ Justine - the two issues regarding the PICs were whether there should be a PDP on mandatory PICS and their inclusion in the actual agreement and the other issue was whether to continue with voluntary PICS

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:51) Excellent, thanks Olivieir

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:51) Olivier

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:53) @ Justine - your question please

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:55) @Holly, Q 2.8.1.e.15

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (16:56) Tks - will have a look and get back to you

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (16:58) Olivier, I've already told that I didn't need the 10 minutes agenda item 4

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (17:10) I have attempted to read the GDPR ;)

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (17:11) I loss the sound

Ā Ā Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (17:11) Thank youĀ Ā @ Alan

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (17:17) The real shame is that RDAP implementation did NOT require the implementation of tiered access.Ā Ā What RDAP does is allow the addition of the ability to provide tiered access.

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:18) my connection was lost I am back again

Ā Ā Maureen Hilyard: (17:21) Thank you Alan for the explanations for each of the recommendations. - it really helps for understanding

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (17:24) Staff, can I have the screen unsynched please?

Ā Ā Holly Raiche: (17:25) Can we please have the ablity to scroll

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (17:25) sure!

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:27) May I please receive a dial out

Ā Ā Yesim Nazlar: (17:28) Dialing out to you now

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:28) ok thanks

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (17:33) Absolutely! Dubious data mining occurs with other databases like TMCH's. Rate limiting should be applied to "non-legit miners"

Ā Ā Gordon Chillcott: (17:34) Generally support SSAC 101, but I confess to being soft on Recommendatin 4.

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (17:35) We can't really be selective about which law enforcement authorities to give access to or limit access.

Ā Ā Alan Greenberg: (17:37) @Justine, yes we can and will!

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (17:38) @Alan, good luck!

Ā Ā Nadira AL-Araj: (17:39) I agree Justine, and what about corapt entitiesĀ Ā within the system

Ā Ā Alfredo Calderon: (17:40) +1 with Alan's position. We as end-users are affected by what the recommendations imply.

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:40) in my opinion nothing is not an option

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (17:41) +1 with Alan and Alfredo

Ā Ā Justine Chew: (17:41) +1 for SSAC101

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:42) the rational is very imprortant

Ā Ā Gordon Chillcott: (17:42) I willĀ Ā support the letter.

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (17:42) I supportĀ Ā 101

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:43) icann is a joint controller

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (17:44) +1 for an assertive position around SSAC101

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:45) i support 101

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (17:46) Thanks everyone this action is most useful

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (17:46) I will refer to it if needs be in the GNSO Council

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:46) ultimately I would have liked that we submit our own whuch could have overlapping issues

Ā Ā Satish Babu: (17:46) Thanks Alan, for the useful insights

Ā Ā Nadira AL-Araj: (17:46) Thank yo u Alan

Ā Ā Marita Moll: (17:46) Thanks everyone. Great discussion

Ā Ā Maureen Hilyard: (17:46) Great discussion thank you.

Ā Ā Alfredo Calderon: (17:46) @Alan, thanks for an insight view and discussion.

Ā Ā Gordon Chillcott: (17:47) Thank you, Alan - it was worth while.

Ā Ā Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (17:47) still a *To Do* then Hadia

Ā Ā Alfredo Calderon: (17:47) Thanks!

Ā Ā Gordon Chillcott: (17:47) Bye for now.

Ā Ā Alberto Soto: (17:47) Thanks to all, bye bye!

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:47) Ok cheryl thanks

Ā Ā Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (17:47) Bue

Ā Ā Hadia Elminiawi: (17:47) bye all