19 August 2014 Meeting

This meeting of the non-PDP GNSO Data & Metrics for Policy Making Working Group typically takes place on Tuesdays at alternating - for local times, see http://tinyurl.com/nk8jt3u.

Adobe Connect room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/dmpm/

http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-dmpm-20140819-en.mp3
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#aug

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/

Attendees:
Cheryl Langdon-Orr – ALAC
Jonathan Zuck – IPC
Graeme Bunton – RrSG
Marinel Rosca – Individual
Andrew Merriam – RySG
Pam Little – RySG
Tony Onorato - Individual

Apologies:
none

ICANN staff:
Berry Cobb
Steve Chan
Nathalie Peregrine

Proposed Agenda – DMPM WG Meeting – 19   August 2014 @ 20:00 UTC (60 Min):

1. Roll Call / Statements of Interest

2. Review Use Case Analysis Compilation

3. Discuss metrics requirements for Issue Reports

4. Discuss next steps and confirm next meeting

Adobe Connect chat transcript for Tuesday 19 August 2014:

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Welcome to the Data and Metrics for Policy Making Working Group on the 19th of August 2014

  Graeme Bunton:3:58, giv'er a couple

  Marinel Rosca:Hello

  Graeme Bunton:a degree in ICANN?

  Graeme Bunton:could you IMAGINE?

  Graeme Bunton:makes sense to me

  Tony Onorato:makes sense to me

  Marinel Rosca:I am ok with the idea

  Pam Little:Idon't think we can anticipate every scenario.

  Pam Little:We are trying to develop a framework.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:I agree Pam we can do ptinipals though

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:should read principles

  Tony Onorato:to an extent this might be dealt with by having both a quantitative and qualitative section

  Tony Onorato:to any "survey", I should say

  Tony Onorato:sorry -- just hung up -- will call back

  Tony Onorato:i'm back

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:can't get it  WHEN  asked for  it may be able to b got at another point in time

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:;-

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:phew

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:I love hats

  Graeme Bunton:can you count discrete occurences of the issue

  Tony Onorato:Yes, I would have

  Tony Onorato:NP

  Berry Cobb:writing them down.  :-)

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:your trying t get ME t be practical!  surely not !!!

  Pam Little:I agree with Jonathan.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:Yes  base line data  can be best guessed (often)and be used as baseline so IN the IR

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:YES

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:Berry then the IR  identifies  that the data is desirable  but needs to be outsourced

  J:But why can't staff outsource it?

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:in some cses thay could,  if it is within existing resource allocations  and in some cases it would be a yes  but it will take 6 months  to get it from someone 

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:in some case you might need to ask for EOI's  from consuktants  etc.,

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:they could identify that it NEEDS to be done in some cases  where the aquisition is problomatic or out of 'current' reach

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:agree Berry but it could be in the IR  to identify that the data on yur exampler of expiry dates  will need to be sourced  if desirable  by a non internal ICANN method

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:and  then resourced as required when it can be

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:exactly Pam

  Berry Cobb:Agreed.  But visability only goes as far as submissions to ICANN Compliance.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:and this will continue to be a changing landsxape  where of course a part of ICANN can also use the identifiable data desires  from IR's  as reason to update or better modify their internal data collection and reporting methods

  Pam Little:yes

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:IGF

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:skip  to 9th is fine   NOT the 26th auOGF  is on and I am busy

  Graeme Bunton:Probably

  Berry Cobb:copy that.

  Berry Cobb:Thank you everyone.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:all good thanks al talk on the 9th more then...

  Marinel Rosca:Thank you

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr 2:bye