/
URS Question #7

URS Question #7

URS Question #7

What mechanism do you suggest that allows a URS Provider to efficiently check with other URS and UDRP Providers in order to ensure that a disputed domain name is not already subject to an open and active URS/UDRP proceeding? 


Context:

This question stems from the URS Rule 3(g), which states: “A URS Complaint may not be filed against a domain name that is part of an open and active URS or UDRP case.” 


FORUM already checks whether there is any duplicative filing of URS proceedings. Most of FORUM’s Complainants are also well informed and abide by the rules. Among the URS cases handled by FORUM, FORUM reported that no disputed domain name was already subject to an open and active URS/UDRP proceeding. ADNDRC at least checks whether the same Complaint has already been filed with another ADNDRC office.