The ICANN68 Planning Committee will work on the ICANN68 At-Large Schedule, implementing the Action Items from ICANN67 as well as the Sub Committee on Outreach and Engagements suggestions.

Mailing list: icann68-pc@icann.org

Planning Committee Members

Name	Region
Maureen Hilyard	APRALO
Barrack Otieno	AFRALO
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez	LACRALO
Cheryl Langdon-Orr	APRALO
Daniel Nanghaka	AFRALO
Dave Kissoondoyal	AFRALO
Hadia Elminiawi	AFRALO
Holly Raiche	APRALO
Joanna Kulesza	EURALO
Jonathan Zuck	NARALO
Natalia Filina	EURALO
Olivier Crépin-Leblond	EURALO
Sébastien Bachollet	EURALO
Sergio Salinas Porto	LACRALO
Sylvia Herlein Leite	LACRALO
Tijani Ben Jemaa	AFRALO
Yrjö Länsipuro	EURALO

Meetings:

Meetings will be held weekly until the At-Large Schedule is finalised.

Next Meeting: 09 June 2020

Last Meeting: 02 June 2020

SCHEDULING:

ICANN68 Sessions of Interest

Please list hereafter potential session topics for ICANN68.

Session Idea	Proposer	Other related Comments
Public Interest Commitment (PIC)	Jonathan Zuck	critical to Sub Pro and dot Org
DNS Abuse (Threshold)	Jonathan Zuck	Panel Discussion: Single proposal about DNS Abuse, getting feedback and having a discussion on this
GAC & ALAC Meeting	Yrjö Länsipuro	(28/04) Raised that in preparation for Cancun, there was going to be an ALAC session with the GAC's Public Safety WG to discuss DNS Abuse. We should carry this on and perhaps bring in some other stakeholder groups
DNS Abuse, Covid-19 and End User Issues	Joanna Kulesza	(28/04) Before finalising any particular topics, Joanna would like to have more feedback from the community. For example if discussing DNS Abuse should we include the multistakeholder approach? cooperate with the GAC? incorporate cybersecurity? (28/04) Dave Kissoondoyal: end-user issue: Can we consider economic ramifications and Inflation, Domain names price increase post COVID resulting to registrants cancelling their domain names thereby affecting end users
Public Forum	Sebastien Bachollet	(28/04) Seb suggested that we retain a Public Forum so that people can bring up end-user issues that can more properly be addressed by SO-AC Chairs rather than a panel of the Board - especially when the priorities for session might be multistakeholder model; future ICANN Meetings and Covid-19; prioritisation - whose priorities ? A "townhall session" has been raised as a possibility that people can bring their questions to a panel of experts (might need to be prepared questions to ensure that the responses are relevant to end-users). Other participants may also ask associated questions.
APAC Session	Maureen Cheryl	(28/04) APAC Hub needs to identify an appropriate topic that relates to the APAC region and to encourage a small panel of APAC experts to discuss and tie in with end-user communities in the APAC region. Include a session that is APAC friendly in topic and timezone. Chinese translation services could be provided? Contact Jiarong.
PDP 3.0	Holly Raiche	(28/04) Background: If you read through the outcomes of the GNSO Review from a few years back, the first recommendations are about wider involvement of the community - with some policy suggestions from the GNSO on what they could do - and they said, in their response, that the recommendations were implemented. The underlying theme would be how does the GNSO continue to support a multi stakeholder model and the recommendations of their own review which they accepted - when PDP3 will narrow the ability of people - ALAC members - to participate. Suggested People attending - GNSO Chair, the chair of the WG on PDP 3, plus you JZ and maybe OCL Proposed agenda would start with (1) the GNSO recommendations on participation - and their response. (2)Then ask if what they said they would do in response to their review, they have done ,(3) Maybe response from ALAC. (4) Then discussion of PDP3 - maybe ALAC voices - and why that will shut down participation of all but a few ALAC members, Then (5) Discussion on how to ensure we retain a multi stakeholder in light of the ‘efficiencies’ of PDP3
Subsequent Procedures	Jonathan Zuck	Applicant Support and Community Priority Evaluation - comment raised that raising the applicant support might raise expectation that another round is imminent
John Crain	Heidi Ullrich	To discuss technical Issues
Evolution of Multistakeholder Model	Marita Moll