| Chat | 00:34:47 joke.braeken: hello all, welcome!
00:36:44 souleymane: No comment
00:40:06 Barrack Otienk: Maybe the person who was not satisfied found the meeting room too cold :-)
00:40:33 Katrina: I don't think IT was the problem :)
00:41:07 souleymane: yes Katrina
00:41:56 Extra Red of Dmitry: lunch or cocktail? which costs less? :)
00:42:10 souleymane: Cocktail
00:42:35 Katrina: I think it depends
00:47:14 Barrack Otienk: could that question be with respect to the Council meeting
00:47:20 gudrunpoulsen: you are doing a great job Alejandra :)
00:47:30 Barrack Otienk: why are ccTLDS observers not allowed ro contribute?
00:47:50 Barrack Otienk: someone asked me that question
00:48:02 Barrack Otienk: in Marrakech
00:48:09 Barrack Otienk: exactly
00:49:15 ppoblete: In the answer you should mention the Council Meeting
00:49:19 Katrina: maybe you can ask to clarify 1) what did the person mean by "ccTLD observer" and 2) what kind of contribution (that is not allowed) did the person mean
00:49:19 Barrack Otienk: Maybe the Chair can be explaining that when the meeting starts so that it is clear from the onset.
00:49:36 Barrack Otienk: i am an observer but i endorse
00:49:53 Katrina: you're not a "ccTLD observer"
00:50:49 Barrack Otienk: :-) correct on a light note
00:51:02 Sean Copeland: Sorry Alejandra I was making a cup of tea
00:51:22 Katrina: we have this "very dissatisfied" every time :)
00:51:58 Hiro Hotta: observers to contribute? I guess the person who commented thought that observers can only observe not speak. So, if chairs agree, chairs have better to ask for observers' input explicitly in the meetings.
00:52:55 barbarap: there're allways people ho will be unhappy and maybe they don't even want to explain, why
00:52:59 ppoblete: The Council Meeting is the only one where active participation is restricted basically to councillors and others that the Chair deems relevant
00:53:00 Barrack Otienk: thanks Katrina, actually the person who asked me the question has a colleague on the Council and felt she needed to make a point. i reminded her we are just observers and what observers do and cannot do.
00:53:40 Barrack Otienk: correct Patricio
00:54:33 ppoblete: I mean: The Council Meeting is the only open meeting where active participation is restricted basically to councillors and others that the Chair deems relevant
01:03:18 Katrina: time for the ccNSO/ALAC meeting will have to change (if we can find another slot)
01:16:15 Katrina: Does the ccNSO Organisational Review really need 60 minutes?
01:20:54 barbarap: There's probably a typo in block 4 - it shuld end at 16:45, not at 16:00?
01:23:21 barbarap: Sorry -anther typo in Block 3 : 13:30 to 14:15 and 14:14-15:00 (it's 14:45)
01:23:37 souleymane: ok
01:23:58 barbarap: :-)))
01:24:31 barbarap: I believe RO updates would be useful, just don't know about the time
01:25:59 Ajay Data: pl share some more light on Internet Governance Discussion
01:26:20 Ajay Data: what specific topic we wish to focus in this
01:28:00 Extra Red of Dmitry: also, block 4 is 15:15 to 15:00, so 45 minutes
01:28:10 Ajay Data: thank you.
01:28:29 Extra Red of Dmitry: either description or length is wrong; I think it’s 90”
01:28:39 Extra Red of Dmitry: so it would end 16:45
01:28:57 ppoblete: (I apologize because I will have to leave at 10 local time, ie. in a couple of minutes)
01:30:24 Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]: Bye Patricio :) Thank you for joining
01:31:13 souleymane: Bye
01:31:19 Katrina: thank you! bye!!!
01:31:21 Ondřej Filip: Tnak you
01:31:21 souleymane: thanks
01:31:22 Ondřej Filip: bye
01:31:22 gudrunpoulsen: Thanks for this call. Bye :)
01:31:23 Sean Copeland: bye
01:31:23 barbarap: thank you, Alejandra
01:31:25 Barrack Otienk: bye
01:31:28 ppoblete: bye!
01:31:32 Ajay Data: thank you. bye |