nairobi_meeting_reports_tuesday

This page is for you to publish your meeting reports for Tuesday. Please log in with your email address and password ad use the "edit" button to add your report.

Reports from other days:

Saturday, 06 March 2010
Sunday, 07 March 2010
Monday, 08 March 2010
Wednesday, 10 March 2010
Thursday, 11 March 2010
Friday, 12 March 2010

Registrar Stakeholder Group Meeting

Time: 0900 - 1700
Location: Aberdere
Author: Baudouin Schombe

Please add your report here

ccNSO Members Meeting

Time: 0900 - 1800
Location: Shimba
Author: Rudi Vansnick, Ron Sherwood

Please add your report here

Introduction to New gTLD's

Time: 0930 - 1030
Location: Tsavo Annex 2
Author: Wolf Ludwig, Dave Kissoondoyal, Les Allison

Please add your report here

Strengthening ccTLD's in Africa

Time: 1100 - 1230
Location: Batian
Author: Rudi Vansnick, Dave Kissoondoyal, Baudoin Schombe, Adam Peake

Please add your report here

ALAC Improvements Discussion w. Interested Members of the SIC and BGC

Time: 1400 - 1500
Location: Taifa
Author: Sebastien Bachollet, Dave Kissoondoyal, Carlton Samuels

Please add your report here

SSAC Open Meeting

Time: 1400 - 1530
Location: Batian
Author: Gareth Shearman, Dev Teelucksingh

Please add your report here

GAC Meeting with ICANN Board

Time: 1700 - 1800
Location: Lenana
Author: Sebastien Bachollet, Adam Peake

Please add your report here

Potential Consumer Constituency

Time: 1700 - 1800
Location: Batian
Author: Evan Leibovitch, Andres Piazza

Author:Gareth Shearman

Consumers constituency meeting:
This remains a very contentious topic. The discussion at this meeting was very useful however as it allowed for the genesis and history of the Consumers constituency proposal to be clearly outlined. Most of the attendees seemed to support the proposal and wanted it to continue through the approval process right away. Rob Hoggarth, the staff member in attendance was able to assist us with our understanding of some of the contentious aspects of the issue.

One or two of the individuals attending were involved with the NCUC consumer interest group activity. It is my feeling that the meeting was useful as it clarified for those individuals the reality of the formal proposal that conforms to the new NCSG realities.

A fuller understanding of the nuances surrounding this meeting was gained through attendance at the GNSO meeting at Noon.

The “interest group” idea seems to be promoted by the group involved with the old NCUC. They are opposed to the constituency proposal.

This dichotomy was reflected in the afternoon meeting. The next steps were unclear but the majority of the attendees wanted the proposal to move forward. The attendees will be contacted by e-mail for follow up.

Please add your report here |