At-Large ICANN Future Meetings Strategy Workspace

At-Large ICANN Future Meetings Strategy Workspace

Comment Close
Date

Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s) and
RALO(s)

Call for
Comments

Call for
Comments
Close 

Vote
Announcement 

Vote Open

Vote
Reminder

Vote Close

Date of Submission

Staff Contact and Email

Statement Number

Comment Close
Date

Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s) and
RALO(s)

Call for
Comments

Call for
Comments
Close 

Vote
Announcement 

Vote Open

Vote
Reminder

Vote Close

Date of Submission

Staff Contact and Email

Statement Number

21.04.2014

ICANN Future Meetings Strategy

adopted14Y, 0N, 0A

@Tijani BEN JEMAA

07.04.2014

12.04.2014 23:59 UTC

14.04.2014 00:00 UTC

14.04.2014 00:00 UTC

18.04.2014

19.04.2014 00:00 UTC

21.04.2014

Tanzanica King tanzanica.king@icann.org

AL-ALAC-ST-0414-01-00-EN

 

For information about this PC, please click here

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

The At-Large Advisory Committee supports the recommendations of the Meeting Strategy Working Group report.

The differentiation of the 3 annual meetings looks interesting and would permit to:

  • Improve the geographic rotation allowing ICANN to go to countries where no large meeting venues are available

  • Minimize the number of conflicting sessions through the separation of the constituencies’ internal work and the cross community sessions.

  • Give more opportunities the cross community interaction

  • Increase concentrated time of policy work

  • Undertake outreach to engage with local Internet communities

  • Increase opportunities for thematic, regional and or language-based interactions.

The ALAC also appreciates very much that visa deliverance becomes one of the main criteria for the selection of the meetings venue.

In addition, the ALAC suggests the following:

  • that local availability of an open Internet without hindrance should also be added to the selection criteria.

  • that venues without facilities for the easy participation of disabled communities should not be considered

  • that video coverage of meetings using cameras and camera-work (pan and zoom) rather than a stationary Webcam would make the meetings more engaging for remote participants thus putting less pressure on face to face meetings

Finally, we welcome the recommendation not restricting rotation of any meeting to ICANN hub cities. 

FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTED

The At-Large Advisory Committee supports the recommendations of the Meeting Strategy Working Group report.

The differentiation of the 3 annual meetings looks interesting and would permit to:

  • Improve the geographic rotation allowing ICANN to go to countries where no large  meeting rooms are available

  • Minimize the number of conflicting sessions through the separation of the constituencies’ internal work and the cross community sessions.

  • Give more opportunities for the cross community interaction

  • Increase concentrated time of policy work

  • Undertake outreach to engage with the local Internet communities

  • Increase opportunities for thematic, regional and or language-based interactions.

 Also, the ALAC appreciates very much that the visa deliverance becomes one of the main criteria for the selection of the meetings venue. 

On the other hand, we welcome the recommendation not restricting rotation of any meeting to ICANN hub cities.