Team Meeting #25 | 13 November 2024 @ ICANN81

Members and Liaisons: Alan Barrett, Ashley Heineman, Brett Carr, Carlton Samuels, Ching Chiao, Edowaye Makanjoula, Jonathan Robinson, Kim Davies, Lars-Johan Liman, Marilia Hirano, Olga Cavalli, Peter Koch, Rafik Dammak, Rick Wilhelm, Sami Ali, Steve Conte
Observers: /
Apologies: N/A
ICANN org: Brenda Brewer, Elizabeth Garber (technical writer), Reda Josifi

Welcome, Roll Call, SOI updates
Action Items (all action items tracked in the Google sheet linked here [docs.google.com])

Reference	Date	Action item	Status
24-01	29 October 2024	ICANN support team to look into the formal relationship between the ICANN and PTI Boards (particularly as it pertains to the Domain Name function and report back to the review team. Review team to decide on whether more transparency and openness needed.	Discussion to take place at the 13 November meeting. Email response shared with the IFR2 Team on 8 November.
24-02	29 October 2024	Elizabeth to summarize contract review’s ‘nice to have’ marked items in a table to share with the IFR2 Team.	Summary will be shared at the 13 November meeting.
07-01	4 March 2024	As follow up from the 6 March CSC briefing: Co-chairs to consider formally asking the CSC liaison if there is anything they would like to bring to the attention of the IFR2.	Ongoing - On hold for future consideration, once the IFR2 gets to a place in its work where it feels it can phrase the question most meaningfully.

- Rick and Jonathan to provide any immediate reactions/comments from their presentation to the RySG on Tuesday, 12 November.
- Questions posed to the RySG group after the presentation
  - Do members of the RySG:

1. 1. 1. Find that PTI’s performance is meeting their needs?
    2. Experience any systemic issues?
    3. Find that the IANA Naming function contract and statement of work meet their needs?

4. Revisiting discussion on the formal relationship between the ICANN and PTI Boards (particularly as it pertains to the domain name function).

- Email response [docs.google.com] shared with the IFR2 team on 8 November.Summary of ‘nice to have’ contract review items
- Table summarizing contract items marked as ‘nice to have’ during contract review will be shared with the group during the meeting.

5) Summary of ‘nice to have’ contract review items

Table summarizing contract items marked as ‘nice to have’ during contract review will be shared

with the group during the meeting.

7. Next Meeting:

8. AOB, close

IANA Naming Function Review