/
16 January 2018 (20:00 UTC)

16 January 2018 (20:00 UTC)

Owned by Kimberly Carlson
Last updated: Jan 16, 2018 by Joke Braeken

Attendees

Members:  Alejandra Reynoso, Jordan Carter, Giovanni Seppia
Staff: Bart Boswinkel, Joke Braeken, Kim Carlson
Apologies:  none

Agenda

  1. Welcome
  2. Consultation Document

table (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10MJjouvWBMCG3GaZftfGMW6rwcjP_gKwWH169t55_68/edit?usp=sharing)  

a) Discussion first input

b) Next steps

      1. Suggested consultation with the ccNSO Council
      2. Consultation with ccNSO Meeting Programme WG?
      3. First draft consultation document for the broader community

 3. AOB

 4. Closure

Notes

1. Welcome

2. Consultation Document

2.a. Discussion first input

  • doc should be clear, and short. Some of the questions are not clear, and overlap. 10 to 15 questions max. 

    Distill the most important questions. Show background. Things that are controversial. If there are views or proposals by the group, we are likely to get more feedback. 

  • Involving the ccNSO Council. what do they expect from the group? opinion against the strategy? 

    However, the council already approvedthe ToR: So they agree with the direction of travel already. The council tasked this group, however it is a good testing environment for the questions. 
    Same is true for the ccNSO Meeting Programme WG. Based on their feedback, refine the questionnaire. 

  • online consultation should start asap, until after ICANNN61 in order to gather as much feedback as possible

2.b Next steps

background paper + questionnaire + discussion at the ccNSO members Meeting 

The questions drive the background paper. Once the background paper is in place, distill the questions.
If there  are areas where we as a group do not prefer to give recommendations, it would be worth specifying this in the background paper.
Suggestion to have the questionnaire, and to divide people in the ccNSO Members Meeting, during the face-to-face session. e.g. 
Should we have a ccTLD News Session at every public ICANN meeting?

Current strategy: decision not to differentiate the different public meetings, in terms of the ccNSO Programme.

Action item #1: initial background paper to be prepared by the Secretariat in 2 weeks of time, including a limited set of questions

Action item #2: doodle poll to schedule a meeting from 05 Febr onwards.


3. AOB

ccNSO Members Meeting: Tue, 13 March 2018 : 90 min consultation with the community. Interactive session


4. Closure and Next Meeting

Meeting scheduled for Tue, 30 Jan 2018 (20:00 UTC) - cancelled

See action item #2

Chat Transcript

  Joke Braeken:Welcome to today's ccNSO Meeting Strategy Review Team meeting!
  Joke Braeken:Please find the link to the table here: https://buff.ly/2DAH2cC] 
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Hello !
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:I can't connect my microphone to the AC room :(
  Joke Braeken:hi Alejandra. 
  Joke Braeken:I think Kim just connected it. Can you please try again?
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:ok
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:let's see
  Jordan Carter:hi hi
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Good afternoon over here ;)
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Hi Bart :)
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:I have it in my screen, it's too big for AC room
  Jordan Carter:i don't mind if we consult the Council either
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:yes, no problem
  Jordan Carter:so use the paper, the questionnaire and the discussion at the meeting all together
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Or both ;) 
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Not sure everyone will read the background paper 
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Though I hope everyone will read it
  Jordan Carter:that sounds good
  Jordan Carter:happy to push the meeting back a week if that helps
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Me too
  Jordan Carter:Here’s my take on the key questions:
- Should there be a ccNSO members meeting at every ICANN meeting? Or is it worth changing the B meeting (middle of year) to just be Council and Working Groups?

- Should the standard ccNSO members meeting remain at two days, or should it be shorter? Longer?

- Would you like to have two streams of work during the ccNSO members meetings or keep everything together in one room? (would allow more topics but you would have to choose which session to attend)

- Should we focus each ccNSO members meeting on a specific topic or area e.g tech, business, policy, or keep a diverse range of topics in each meeting? (focus might allow different ccTLD staff to attend particular meetings of most use for them)
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:I can on Tuesday 6/feb.
  Jordan Carter:oh that formatting didn't wrrk
  Jordan Carter:i will put this on the email list
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Thank you Jordan ;)
  Joke Braeken: ccnsowkspc:12 January 2018 @12:00 UTC
  Jordan Carter:thanks everyone!
  Jordan Carter:talk soon
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:Thanks all :)
  Alejandra Reynoso [.gt]:bye :)

Recordings