30 April 2012 Meeting
- Berry Cobb
When: Monday, 30 APR, 2012. GMT Standard Time. 19:00 UTC / This is a 90 Minute Call.
12:00 PDT, 15:00 EDT, 20:00 London, 21:00 CET , 03:00 Beijing
Adobe Connect Link: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/whoissdt/
Wiki page:
https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/display/WSDT/Home
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-whois-survey-wg-20120430-en.mp3
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#apr
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees
Cintra Sooknanan - ALAC
Susan Prosser - RrSG
Michael Young - Individual
Anne Naffziger - IPC
Steve Metalitz - IPC
Don Blumenthal - RySG
Avri Doria - NCSG
Wilson Abigaba - RrSG
ICANN Staff
Berry Cobb
Nathalie Peregrine
Apology: Wendy Seltzer - NCSG (connected at first then lost cell signal for rest of the call)
Agenda:
- Agenda Bashing (2 Min)
- Review Previous Week Action Items (20 Min)
- All Open Actions Reviewed & Closed
- Review WHOIS Requirements Survey version 9 (60 Min)
- Expected Outcome: Draft #10 of Survey Questionnaire ready for import to tool
- Webinar to SO/AC
- Independent Review
- New Business (5 Min)
- Review of Assigned Action Items (3 Min)
Open Action Items:
- Berry - 9 MAR - Schedule SO/AC WSWG Roadshow via Webinar (post Costa Rica) - PENDING
- Berry - 19 APR - Update Draft Survey v8.4 - COMPLETE
- Update yes/no/[indifferent]
- Update Definition of R10 - WHOWAS, reference to 4.6
- Berry - 19 APR - Send email to WSWG - Call for Volunteers Roundup - COMPLETE
- Berry - 20 APR - Send email to WSWG - Call for comments about R9 inclusion and possible questions - COMPLETE
- Micahel - 25 APR - Update Draft Survey v8.5 - COMPLETE
- Review length of survey, simplify technical language
- Highlight technical terms within Survey that will require the Hover Definition feature / Highlight & Comment for import in tool
- R3 - Divide question #1 in to two or more questions
- R8.1 - Divide question set using Past versus Future lens
- Michael/Berry - 30 APR - Use of "Question is Relevant " per section/question (review R-6a & R-6b as example) / Collaborate w/ Avri on Prioritization Requirement & [Indifferent]
- Michael - 30 APR - Identify Draft Survey Test Takers (possible candidates: Don B., Francisco A., Dave P.) - COMPLETE
- Michael - 30 APR - Create 1st draft communication to GNSO Council stating WG's intention of implementation regarding the "Independent Review" per the Charter - COMPLETE
Current Key Milestones:
• Load survey questions into tool – 7 MAY 2012
• Internal Survey Test Control Group – 14 MAY 2012
• Evangelize SO & ACs, Webinar – MAY 2012, Post Costa Rica
• Submit Draft Survey – 14 MAY 2012
• Public comment period – 14 MAY 2012 (42 days min)
• Rework draft – MAY/JUNE 2012
• Independent review – JUNE 2012
• Submit to GNSO & release survey for 30 days – 30 JUNE 2012
• Review Survey results – JUL/AUG 2012
• Release Survey results – 31 AUG 2012
• Publish Final Report – 31 OCT 2012
Adobe Connect Chat:
Berry Cobb: Welcome to the 30 APR WSWG Call.
Cintra Sooknanan: Hi Everyone
Don Blumenthal: have to call back in on another line to fix echo
Nathalie Peregrine: Wendy Seltzer has joined the call
Berry Cobb: Michele Neylon - michele@blacknightsolutions.ieBob Brasich - Bob_Brasich@mpaa.orgDan Seymour - dseymour@theesa.comDon Blumenthal - dblumenthal@pir.orgJim GalvinNicolas Adam - nickolas.adam@GMAIL.COMSteve Sheng - steve.sheng@icann.orgFrancisco Arias - francisco.arias@icann.orgDave Piscitello - dave.piscitello@icann.org
Cintra Sooknanan: Also I'd like to add Evan Leibovitch evan@telly.org
Cintra Sooknanan: and a couple others, I will get their information to you once they accept
avri: for me, i just forwarded on Berry's message asking if anyone was intersted.
Berry Cobb: Thank you Avri
Berry Cobb: Dear Council.Initially in the WSWG charter we described a step in our workflow that involved retaining a third party consulting resource to review the WSWG WHOIS (RDDS) requirements survey and provide comments on the structure on the questions in regards to general comprehension and structure. Some time after the WSWG began executing the work items in its charter, the WG decided to add a "beta test" of a draft candidate of the survey as well as post the draft survey for public comment. We believe that these new activities represent a more comprehensive form of feedback that we would garner from a single consulting resource, making the consulting resource review a redundant and unnecessary action. We therefore, respectfully, plan to not pursue the consulting resource review, unless explicitly requested to do so by the Council. Thank you.
Michael Young: note the commas are missing
Michael Young: :-)
Nathalie Peregrine: Wilson is showing as connected on the bridge
avri: i think R-2.2 may need some worksmithing.
avri: wordsmithing
Michael Young: can you send suggested edits?
avri: i thinkl we are either sking about benefits or affect, but having both in the sentence confuses me.
Cintra Sooknanan: The question is in the positive
Cintra Sooknanan: so it is referring to benefits Only
Susan Prosser: also R-2.1 is first introduction to RDDS terms, may need definition
Cintra Sooknanan: should it be neutral or should we have a separate question for negatives
Cintra Sooknanan: ???
Cintra Sooknanan: okie :) thanks
Cintra Sooknanan: Yes
Cintra Sooknanan: Do you expect someone to do the survey in one sitting
Cintra Sooknanan: ?
Don Blumenthal: What about the ability to start online, quit, and resume later?
Don Blumenthal: Great, especially given the length
Steve Metalitz: As previously advised, I will have to drop off in a couple of minutes. Apologies.
Michael Young: thanks steve
Cintra Sooknanan: Just one comment with the last section 7a, we should ask the person to specify their optional time period
Michael Young: ah yes
Michael Young: good idea
Cintra Sooknanan: Sorry
Cintra Sooknanan: don't mean to regress
Cintra Sooknanan: Please specify, give reason
Cintra Sooknanan: Thanks Michael
Cintra Sooknanan: Lucky version 10 :)
Cintra Sooknanan: yes time is short to book a meeting
Cintra Sooknanan: Michael can you state the next steps when we can anticipate v 10 will be ready for the testers (beta)?
Michael Young: sure
Michael Young: we have some flexibility
Cintra Sooknanan: Can't hear very soft
Susan Prosser: Cintra: was asking about consistency in format
Susan Prosser: yes, no, indifferent, vs no, & capitalization
Susan Prosser: thanks Michael
Cintra Sooknanan: Good call, thanks and Bye
Cintra Sooknanan: lol