ARIWG Prioritization and Dependencies - Issue #16
NOTE: text in cells below shown in colour is DRAFT only for demonstration purposes and discussion within the AIRWG
Issue #16 | Absence of consistent performance metrics. |
|---|---|
Final Proposal as approved by the Board | The ALAC has had a Metrics WG and an ALS Review Taskforce, both of which largely went into stasis during the IANA Transition and Accountability efforts. It is proposed to revive this activity as part of the At-Large Review Implementation. The ALAC notes that regional differences make it more difficult to have uniformity over participation metrics, but agrees that is an important target. The ALAC notes that collecting such statistics is a staff-intensive operation. |
Prioritization |
|
ARIWG comments |
|
Status of improvement effort / staff lead |
|
Activities, if any, on which implementation is dependent, or that are dependent on implementation of this recommendation |
|
Who will implement the recommendation: ICANN community, ICANN Board, ICANN Organization, other? |
|
Anticipated resource requirements (FTEs, tools) |
|
Expected budget implications |
|
Proposed implementation steps: |
|
Continuous Improvement(s) |
|
Metrics |
|