ARIWG Prioritization and Dependencies - Issue #6
NOTE: text in cells below shown in colour is DRAFT only for demonstration purposes and discussion within the AIRWG
Issue #6 | Election processes are excessively complex and have been open to allegations of unfairness. |
|---|---|
Final Proposal as approved by the Board | At-Large will continue to evolve its processes through its bottom-up, consensus based, community deliberations and update as and when needed. |
Prioritization |
|
ARIWG comments |
|
Status of improvement effort / staff lead |
|
Activities, if any, on which implementation is dependent, or that are dependent on implementation of this recommendation |
|
Who will implement the recommendation: ICANN community, ICANN Board, ICANN Organization, other? |
|
Anticipated resource requirements (FTEs, tools) |
|
Expected budget implications |
|
Proposed implementation steps: |
|
Continuous Improvement(s) |
|
Metrics |
|