2024-02-27 Transfer Policy Review PDP WG Call

PROPOSED AGENDA

1. Welcome and Chair Updates

2. ICANN79 TPR sessions Agenda

3. CORD Prelim Recs & Rationale (& volunteers)

4. Recap “Established Relationship” topic

5. AOB

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

PARTICIPATION

Apologies: Jody Kolker (RrSG), Sarah Wyld (RrSG), Steinar Grøtterød (At-Large)

Alternates: Christopher Patterson (RrSG), Rich Brown (RrSG), Lutz Donnerhacke (At-Large)

RECORDINGS

Audio Recording

Zoom Recording

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

Notes/ Action Items

 Main discussion and action items

1. Welcome and Chair Updates

   • Link to the slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JIYvzbYHJxK5srf2qbdKr_qslCl-TOcv9iQsJygBEp8/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

   • Members are encouraged to take a look at the rationale document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DpDO2BYTl6TA7ApfPpG3Hpl13nrv4y4x9B3hImrx_Fc/edit [docs.google.com]) and add input where possible

2. ICANN79 TPR sessions Agenda

   • Two sessions during ICANN79 Saturday 2nd of March (link)

   • Links to wiki page agenda of ICANN79 sessions:

   • Session 1: Focus on Recommendations

   • https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TPRPDP/pages/103602214/2024-03-02+ICANN79+Transfer+Policy+Review+PDP+WG+Call+Session+1

   • Session 2: Focus on Established Relationships: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TPRPDP/pages/103602230/2024-03-02+ICANN79+Transfer+Policy+Review+PDP+WG+Call+Session+2

   • 4 Members are encouraged to serve as volunteers to present during ICANN79 to present/read out recommendations

   • Volunteers:

Rec 1: Prudence

Rec 2: Theo

Rec 3: Owen

Rec 4: Sarah

• Will rationale document be presented? Focus will be on recommendations document as rationale document is still work in progress.

      3.CORD Prelim Recs & Rationale (& volunteers)

      4.Recap “Established Relationship” topic

• Refresher on NACK-ing recommendations (Prelim Rec 16 and Prelim Rec 17). How does this affect registration data?

• Small group redlined Rec 17 where registrars MUST apply 30-day post change lock and included that they may unlock earlier if an established relationship exists.

• Rationale will be further explained and presented during ICANN79 and group should be prepared to speak for or against it during ICANN79.

• Does the group believe that an “Established Relationship” role/procedure should be created? If so, what exemptions should customers be provided with? How do these exemptions impact TPR?

    5.AOB