16 August 2012

The next meeting of the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings Policy Development Process Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 16 August 2012 at 1400 UTC.
 
07:00 PDT, 10:00 EDT, 15:00 London, 16:00 CET, 22:00 Hong Kong
 
For other places see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20120426T14
 
Adobe room details: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lockingdt/.

http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-locking-domain-name-20120816-en.mp3

On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#aug

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO

Master Calendar page:  http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/

Attendees:

Gabriela Szlak, CBUC
Juan Manuel Rojas, At-Large
Randy Ferguson, IPC
Alan Greenberg, ALAC (Vice-Chair)
Matt Schneller, IPC
Celia Lerman Friedman, CBUC
Hago Dafalla, NCUC
Brian Beckham, WIPO
Michele Neylon, RrSG (Chair)
Lisa Garono, IPC
Kristine Dorrain, NAF
Baudoin Schombe, At-Large
Faisal Shah, individual

Apologies:
David Roache-Turner, WIPO

Staff Support:

Margie Milam
Berry Cobb
Glen de Saint Géry

Proposed Agenda:

1. Roll Call / SOI
2. Continue review of survey responses and discuss possible conclusions to be derived from the study
   
   1. Zoomerang Final PDFs and Summary Findings Work Products (sent previously)
   2. UDRP Domain Name Lock Survey - Follow up questions (if submitted)
   3. Attached spreadsheets (see below)
3. 3. Discuss next steps on charter requirements
4. 4. Next steps / confirm next meeting for 30 August 2012

For review:

Adobe Connect Chat Transcript:

Berry Cobb 2: Welcome to the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings working group on 16 August 2012 at 1400 UTC

Michele Neylon: good afternoon

Michele Neylon: I better not post anything here - it'll end up being posted to the entire list and archived for eternity *sniff*

Glen de Saint Gery: Good afternoon Michele!

Michele Neylon: hi

Gabriela Szlak: Hello

Berry Cobb 2: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/udrp-locking-25jul12-en.htm

Matt Schneller: Ems Dispatch, if memory serves

Michele Neylon: http://forum.icann.org/lists/udrp-locking/

Berry Cobb: I will start a first draft modeled off one used in IRTP-C

Michele Neylon: cool

Gabriela Szlak: there´s no vacations in the latin world this month!!!

Gabriela Szlak: :(

Kristine Dorrain: the US has a long weekend over the first weekend in Sept--some folks extend it on either side.

Matt Schneller: folks who have a general preference but no specific comment just want to use the agree/disagree status symbols?

Michele Neylon: guess so

Gabriela Szlak: maybe we need a legal plus a technical definition, and to have both to be coherent in terms of practical purposes

Matt Schneller: I agree too, Michele. Practical impact seems much more important than prescribing specific technical status

Gabriela Szlak: Matt can you clarify what is a agree/disagree status symbol? (sorry, is the +1? you refer to?)

Matt Schneller: (Gabriela, the hand-raise little icon at the top of your Adobe Connect room window drops down and "agree" and "disagree" are two options)

Gabriela Szlak: ohhh thanks!

Gabriela Szlak: :)

Matt Schneller: Alan - is the assumption that there won't be any registries that are as slow to react as the least-responsive registrars?

Alan Greenberg: ANswered verbally, but for the chat record, I was talking about an Internet based request being sent to the registry by the provider and that request woulod be handled by computer without manual intervention.

Gabriela Szlak: I would like to se a udrp provider definition and a registrar definition and compare them, would that too much to ask?