Transcript

Transcript CWG DT-C 13 March.doc

Transcript CWG DT-C 13 March.pdf

Recording

The Adobe Connect recording is available here:  https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p3gtrr94tfz/

The audio recording is available here:  http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-dt3-13mar15-en.mp3

Proposed Agenda:

1. Roll Call

2. Brief introduction of members

3. Expected output, output format and work method, Timeline

4. Proposed work method

5. Next Meeting (Friday March 20 UTC 4PM/16:00)

Notes

Archive is public: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/

Members of DT-C CSC include: 

• Donna Austin is lead
• Staffan Jonson
• Sarah Falvey
• Martin Boyle
• Stephanie Duchesneau
• Kurt Pritz

Kim Davies is potential IANA Liaison

Ashley Heineman is potential NTIA Liaison 

Discussion on next call(s)

- 2 calls next week

- this time is ok with Martin, Stephanie

- martin would like Monday / Friday

- Monday could be problematic for Donna

See no opposition to Monday and Friday at 16:00 UTC

Dividing the work

- suggest looking into dependencies in scope template to divide work

Functional analysis is a good starting point, but also need to focus on the scope of the DT C template. That is is expectation from co-chairs and DT design

Functional analysis: 

Become clear of what will be carried from RFP 3 discussions

Starting with template, to divide work

Suggestion: List of that could be handled. Suggest approach for each of the items, settle the list on Monday

Comment: Authorization function, If it is in, I do not see it. 

A volunteer group, should be gate keeper and be able to act swiftly. Putting it on volunteer committee would be dangerous and is not in template.

Hard job and opportunity,

Identify where should CSCS should play a role

Suggest: Operational way ahead. Authorization discussion should not stop progress

Start with template and views 

Preconceived about CSC, 

Donna volunteers to go back to RFP 3 documents on CSC, and Interim report.

Get a sense of what CSC is responsible for.( elevator, 30 minutes pitch)

Donna: monitoring of performance

Staffan: minimal effort to look at performance, role is instrumental, if acceptable to SLE's and check if IANA performs its technical role (reduce to technical function), in combination with automation, to 
take away capture idea

Sarah: Replaces NTIA technical role, automation is important

Martin: There is role of monitoring performance and montoring reports, and reposting back to own communities about performances, and getting back issues, when issues are identified: communities: 
Registry constuency, ccNSO and Regional ccTLD organisations

Role in service audits, monitor that work and audit and re-audit that work

There is a role when something goes wrong: contact with Function Operator. CSC should be talking to IANA to put it right, able to escalate ( for example to CEO)

Foreword looking role (what is happening ahead)

Budget for development

Stephanie: agree with all being said. Audit, minimum audit, 

CSC touch point, empowered to address issues-> start conversation and initiate escalation

Kurt: Operation changing by IANA ( see David Conrad email on the list). CSC is charged to design the monitor process: If CSC (quality assurance function. CSCS receives reports, and monitor, Escaltion process should be well documented. Charge CSC with escalation

Desing it  and then outsourcing it..Independent. ICANN paid for , and CSC select

Output of today's call:

Action to look at items

Work in Google doc

Action Item:  Donna looks at old documentation, and inform group on relevancy, in relation to scope of DT C

Group members to look at and suggest ways to approach items a-I in template. Share in Google docs to allow others of group to chime in

• • Staffan item A
  • Sarah item B
  • Martin Item C
  • Stephanie Item D
  • Kurt Item E
  • Staffan item F
  • Sarah Item G
  • Martin Item H
  • Stephanie Item I

Action Item:  Grace set up Google docs

Action Item:  Call on Monday: time to be determined. Group to be informed by email based on outcome Doodle poll:  http://doodle.com/v9x7x8hc5kzvisfn

Action Items

Work in Google doc

Action Item:  Donna looks at old documentation, and inform group on relevancy, in relation to scope of DT C

Group members to look at and suggest ways to approach items a-I in template. Share in Google docs to allow others of group to chime in

• • Staffan item A
  • Sarah item B
  • Martin Item C
  • Stephanie Item D
  • Kurt Item E
  • Staffan item F
  • Sarah Item G
  • Martin Item H
  • Stephanie Item I

Action Item:  Grace set up Google docs

Action Item:  Call on Monday: time to be determined. Group to be informed by email based on outcome Doodle poll:  http://doodle.com/v9x7x8hc5kzvisfn

Documents Presented

CSC-Structural Analysisv1.1.pdf

CWG-RFP3-CSC-FunctionalAnalysisV1.2.pdf

CSC DT - 9 March 2015 .pdf

Chat Transcript

Brenda Brewer:Hello everyone and welcome to the DT3 meeting on 13 March @ 16:00 UTC.

  Bart Boswinkel:Hello again:-)

  Staffan Jonson:Hi All

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:Hello all!

  Donna Austin, RySG:Hi all, I'm just dialling in

  Staffan Jonson:http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/

  Donna Austin, RySG:he will be soon

  Grace Abuhamad:https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Sign+Up+Meeting+Slots

  Donna Austin, RySG:Agreed Martin, lets understand the full task and then break it into smaller chunks.

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):this time would work well for me next friday as well

  Donna Austin, RySG:Monday could be problematic for me

  Kurt Pritz:Is the template what was just up on the screen?

  Grace Abuhamad:I think Bart is speaking about this document

  Grace Abuhamad:Bart-- can you confirm?

  Bernard Turcotte - staff support:we can work on some of the basic operational elements

  Grace Abuhamad:Donna -- could you do Monday at 20:00 or 21:00 UTC? We have these times in the sign-up sheet which is the only reason why I'm suggesting it

  Bart Boswinkel:I think it iis

  Grace Abuhamad:Actually, the question is for all

  Donna Austin, RySG:Grace: I have to check,

  Grace Abuhamad:ok @donna

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:Do we need it to be quite so late?

  Sarah Falvey - RySG:I can't next Monday as I have a drs appointment but I could meet at the time in the future.

  Donna Austin, RySG:Grace: can you send a doodle poll with the options

  Donna Austin, RySG:Agreed Stephanie

  Grace Abuhamad:All -- I need to step away for a minute. Bart can you please take notes?

  Donna Austin, RySG:@Martin: we had to take the authorisation process out of this exercise

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):i generally agree with martin that if the auth. function remains this is not the right place

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):if nothing else it seems early for us to be scoping it if there is another DT that hasn't kicked off work

  Brenda Brewer:Hello all, per Donna's request please see doodle poll here:  http://doodle.com/v9x7x8hc5kzvisfn

  Donna Austin, RySG:Agree Martin, on the relationship management piece

  Staffan Jonson:OK should escalation be initiated within or outside CSC?

  Donna Austin, RySG:@Staffan, that's (g) in the template

  Bernard Turcotte - staff support:There is a need for CSC internal escalation

  Bernard Turcotte - staff support:@SD +1

  Donna Austin, RySG:All, I have to drop of adobe but will be on the phone

  Donna Austin, RySG:I have a 10am appointment

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):i have a strong sense that the actual reporting requirements should remain unchanged (this is basically what is stated in the existing draft proposal) is there anyone that disagrees and thinks that this aspect requires significant change

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:@Stephanie:  agree

  Staffan Jonson:Stephanie +1

  Kurt Pritz:I agree with Stephanie also

  Kurt Pritz:did I get one?

  Kurt Pritz:i am for Google docs

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:OK for me, Sarah

  Sarah Falvey - RySG:That was Stephanie :)

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):despite the plug, yes

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):was me

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:How come Kurt only gets 1? :-P

  Sarah Falvey - RySG:Should we give some to Donna?

  Kurt Pritz:Kurt's wil be twice as good

  Sarah Falvey - RySG:oh right she is doing document review

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:so long as it's not twice as long, Kurt!

  Grace Abuhamad:I'm back. Late... I will do Google docs for you :)

  Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG):thanks grace :)

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:Can we do it in a single doc?

  Grace Abuhamad: http://doodle.com/v9x7x8hc5kzvisfn

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:Not 9 of them!

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:1 or 2 hours?

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:not 9 google docs

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:yes a-i =9

  Bernard Turcotte - staff support:BYE

  Staffan Jonson:Thank You all

  Martin Boyle, Nominet:Thanks