Work Stream 1 Questions about ATRT1 simplification

ATRT1 Recommendations    Implementation Assignments       

A.  What was the baseline?   

B.  What did s/he understand the recommendation to be?     

C.  What did s/he understand the underlying issue to be that led to the recommendation?   

D.  What did s/he understand the desired outcome to be from the recommendation?    

E.  How did s/he implement the recommendation?  What options were considered and how was the actual option chosen for implementation?   

F.  Percentage/portion that is complete?   

G.  Does s/he believe ICANN fully implemented the recommendation?  If not, why not? If not, what parts were not implemented, and why not?   

H.  Did s/he run into any new or unforeseen problems or issues while implementing the recommendation? (i.e. scope increase, costs, legal, resources, timing)   

I.  Did s/he identify additional opportunities for improvement by virtue of the implementation of these recommendations?   

J.  What has been the outcome and effect both inside ICANN and external to ICANN as a result of the implementation of the recommendation?   

K.  What has been the feedback both inside ICANN and external to ICANN as a result of the implementation of the recommendation?   

L.  How does s/he feel that ICANN has improved as a result of the implementation of the recommendation?   

M.  What were the dependencies as seen from each group involved in implementation?   

N.  In view of ATRT1 what changes in workflows and/or organization where undertaken?    "Additional Information