Resource Requests
# | Recommendation | Request | Source | Status | Date Requested: | Date Delivered | Purpose of the request |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19 | Rec. 27: Provide clarity on desire for and definition of “independent directors”. Upon clarification of desire and definition, determine the number of specific seats for “independent directors”. | Considering the discussion and the takeaways, ICANN Legal will review the proposed definition and engage with the NomComRIWG to discuss a way forward. | #77 | ![]() |
| Consider revision of the proposed definition. | |
18 | Rec. 24: An empowered body of current and former NomCom members should be formed to ensure greater continuity across NomCom’s, and in particular, to recommend and assist in implementing improvements to NomCom operations. | ICANN org to provide to the RIWG consolidated feedback from the OEC and org on the Draft Standing Committee Charter for RIWG consideration. | #77 | ![]() |
| Provide input on Standing Committee Charter. | |
17 | Rec. 10: Representation on the NomCom should be re-balanced immediately and then be reviewed every five years. | ICANN org to assist with gathering NomComRIWG documentation on: a) options/principles considered for rebalancing; b) community consultation and input on the RIWG proposal for addressing Rec. 10. | #77 | ![]() |
| Inform the OEC on community consultation surrounding implementation of recommendation 10. | |
16 | Various recommendations apply. | ICANN org to assemble a mapping of recommendations to relevant Operating Procedures. | #71 | ![]() |
| This will serve as a starting point to assist NomComRIWG with plans for future proposed modifications of the Operating Procedures, based on the implementation work. | |
15 | N/A | ICANN70 Prep week session: Does the NomComRIWG have the ability to conduct multiple choice questions during the webinar presentation? What version of Zoom will be using, same buttons as on plenary call? | #70 | ![]() |
|
| Improve interaction with the audience during the webinar. |
14 | Rec. 19: ICANN staff and the recruiting consultant, along with NomCom members, should leverage the detailed job description and desired competencies and experience to develop a marketing plan to better target prospective candidates. Consult with the wider ICANN community what additional non-confidential, non-identifiable data points should be collected and published Rec. 23: Consult with the wider ICANN community what additional non-confidential, non-identifiable data points should be collected and published | Obtain statistics on conversion from viewing job description to application, this would be useful feedback on the success of processes undertaken and how recruitment is done. | #70 |
NomComRIWG was updated that there are currently two types of campaign (organic / paid ), that there are improvements to surveys being envisioned, and that NomCom Support Staff is looking into clarifying the details. |
| ||
13 | Rec. 23: Consult with the wider ICANN community what additional non-confidential, non-identifiable data points should be collected and published | Confirm what diversity means out of Work Stream 2, reference the particular categories that were identified part of that work track and the metrics associated with the key diversity categories. NomComRIWG wants to cross-reference to the definitive set of categories and note that those additional metrics should be measured against that established criteria. | #70 |
Tom Barrett shared an email with the working group including diversity categories resulting from WS2. |
| ||
12 | Rec. 24: An empowered body of current and former NomCom members should be formed to ensure greater continuity across NomCom’s, and in particular, to recommend and assist in implementing improvements to NomCom operations. | Annual Reports: NomCom Support Staff to confirm whether publishing annual reports is a standard practice, and when was the last one to be submitted. | #69 |
NomCom Annual Report is published at the discretion of the NomCom Chair, and is not mandated by the Bylaws. However, it could be included in the Operating Procedures as best practices. After 2017 |
|
| |
11 | Rec. 24: An empowered body of current and former NomCom members should be formed to ensure greater continuity across NomCom’s, and in particular, to recommend and assist in implementing improvements to NomCom operations. | Request to ICANN org to create a sandbox where NomComRIWG can start building a future parent page portal to link all NomComs across years and help institutional memory with a collection of links and documents classified by year, and where the standing committee work can be seen. | #69 | ![]() |
| ||
10 | Rec. 25: Improve NomCom selection decisions by assessing the performance and needs of all bodies receiving NomCom appointees. | Request to get a blank copy of the Board's self-assessment template | #68 | ![]() |
| ||
9 | Rec. 16: Implement and codify a system for providing feedback to the NomCom regarding the contributions and participation of members up for re-appointment by the NomCom. | Request to ask NomCom support staff if they are aware of any questions generated in the recent past by the NomCom to the Board regarding feedback on re-applying NomCom appointees | #68 | ![]() |
| ||
8 | Rec. 13: Publish a “Process Diagram” and codify key elements of the NomCom process. Each year, the NomCom should be required to highlight and explain process changes to the ICANN community in an open session. | Develop process maps for:
| #67 |
Only the developed baseline process map will be used for this recommendations, multiple process maps are no longer needed. Baseline process map will be updated later on in the implementation process, to reflect the outcome of some recommendations. |
|
| |
7 | Rec. 13: Publish a “Process Diagram” and codify key elements of the NomCom process. Each year, the NomCom should be required to highlight and explain process changes to the ICANN community in an open session. | Creation of an extensive document repository to help with the institutional memory of the NomCom | #67 | ![]() |
| ||
6 | Rec. 21: The NomCom should use a standardized tool to evaluate and prioritize candidates, based on desired competencies and experience as determined annually. This tool will not replace qualitative assessments of candidates. | Schedule a discussion with HR to find out if they could suggest some assessment tools | #67 |
Such assessment tools already exist within the NomCom as of 2020. A dynamic Google Sheet was developed by the NomCom Assessment Subcommittee to be used as an Assessment tool. This tool scores the candidates on the required competencies to fulfill the open leadership positions. Ultimately, the assessment tool is used as part of the discussion when the Nominating Committee begins the winnowing process. |
|
| |
5 | Rec. 13: Publish a “Process Diagram” and codify key elements of the NomCom process. Each year, the NomCom should be required to highlight and explain process changes to the ICANN community in an open session. | Request to conduct an interview with ICANN NomCom staff. To be thorough, let's follow a bottoms-up approach of identifying the interactions that NomCom staff have with the following: For the past 3 years, please describe your Interactions with the following departments and bodies:
|
Only the developed baseline process map will be used for this recommendations, multiple process maps are no longer needed. Baseline process map will be updated later on in the implementation process, to reflect the outcome of some recommendations. |
|
| The NomComRIWG would like to interview NomCom staff understand how they work today and make it their baseline to start implementing recommendation 13. The end goal is to prepare a predictable model (process map) for incoming and serving nomcom members to understand how these communications run. | |
4 | N/A | Second version of draft Standing Committee Charter; and second version of Introduction to the Proposed Bylaw Changes and Transition Article submitted for ICANN org Legal Department review. LINK | #63 |
|
| NomComRIWG wants both documents to be forwarded to the OEC for their review and input. | |
3 | Rec. 12: NomCom leadership should have input on the NomCom budget and staffing resources. | Schedule a meeting to receive feedback from Finance department on their suggestion and mechanism for implementing this recommendation. | #63 | ![]() |
| ||
2 | Rec.11: The senior staff member supporting NomCom should be accountable to and report to the office of the CEO. | Schedule a meeting in January 2021 with the office of the CEO to receive feedback on how they would like to implement recommendation 11. | #63 | ![]() |
| ||
1 | N/A | Submit Introduction to Proposed Bylaws Changes for ICANN org Legal Department input. | ![]() |
|
| NomComRIWG wants ICANN org legal department input on amendments. |