Link to July survey result (PDF)
Link to survey summary (PDF)
Link to Public comments to draft final report
| Rec # | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | The NomCom term length of one year, even if often renewed for a second year, may not allow for sufficient learning and engagement of members. | NomCom members, except for leadership positions, should serve two-year terms, and be limited to a maximum of two terms. |
| 8 | The current size of the NomCom is appropriate. | Maintain the current size of NomCom. |
| 9 | There is concern over the role and participation of non-voting members. | All NomCom members should be fully participating and voting members, except for NomCom leadership. |
| 10 | There is concern that the NomCom may not accurately represent constituencies (both across SOs/ACs and within SOs/ACs). | Representation on the NomCom should be re-balanced immediately and then be reviewed every five years. |
| 11 | The NomCom is highly dependent on ICANN Staff support. There is concern that the NomCom staff is under-resourced, which has affected the functioning of the NomCom. | The senior staff member supporting NomCom should be accountable to and report to the office of the CEO. |
| 17 | There is some disagreement over whether the NomCom should incorporate additional diversity requirements for its appointees. | Maintain current diversity requirements for NomCom appointees. |