Wednesday, 30 January 2019
...
Action Items: EN
Recording: EN EN ES
AC Chat: EN
Transcript: EN EN ES
...
Participants:
EN: Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Gordon Chillcott, Seun Ojedeji, Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Maureen Hilyard, Jonathan Zuck, Abdulkarim Oloyede, Hadia Elminiawi, Glenn McKnight, Sebastien Bachollet, Tom Dale, Eduarto Diaz, Yrjo Lansipuro, Marita Moll, Nadira Al-Araj, Avri Doria, Alan Greenberg, Christopher Wilkinson, Kaili Kan, Joel Thayer, Lilian Ivette De Luque, Maria Korniiets
...
EPDP Resources: Keep Up with EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data, EPDP Workspace, EPDP Background Documents
About CPWG: CPWG Description, At-Large Website Policy Summary, At-Large Policy Advice Development Page
Add your feedback: Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Website and Wiki Improvements, Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Penholders and Resources Workspace
Policy: 2018 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice, Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Penholders and Resources Workspace
1. Welcome and roll call - Staff (2 minutes)
2. Adoption of agenda, review of Action Items 23 January - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (3 minutes)
...
See: At-Large Workspace: EPDP Final Report for CPWG Discussion
4. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu and All (30 minutes)
See: 2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
See: At-Large Policy Summary
See: At-Large Executive Summary page
See: Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
...
Work Track 5 on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process
The ALAC notes that there has yet to be a discussion about whether any new gTLDs are needed. In case of an expansion, first and foremost, (1) strings with geographic connotations should not present harm (eg. risk for confusion) to end-users and (2) end-users, as residents of a given geographic entity, should have a say, through their governments or public authorities, in how its name is used. The ALAC prefers preventative protection mechanisms for country, territory, sub-national place and capital names. In the case of non-capital city names, there is a balanced support within the ALAC for either (1) requiring support or a non-objection letter from the relevant authority only if the applicant intends to use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city or (2) requiring support or a non-objection letter in any case. As to the 2012 AGB, ALAC thinks that its final version generally worked well and supports, in general, its treatment of geographic names.
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICANN Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan Update |
|
| |||||||||||||
ICANN Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 – 2025 See: Google Doc (comment-only)
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Updated Operating Standards for Specific Reviews |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
5. Policy Talking Points - Jonathan Zuck (5 minutes)
6. CPWG at ICANN64 Community Forum - Joanna Kulesza, Co-Chair of the Capacity Building Working Group (CBWG) (10 minutes)
7. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Jonathan Zuck and All (5 minutes)
7.1 At-Large Workspace: Consultation on Neustar's Proposal for 3-Phased New gTLD Application Model
8. Next Meeting - Olivier Crépin-Leblond (2 minutes)