Human Rights Meeting #26 (18 July 2017 @ 19:00 UTC)
Sub-group Members: Anne Aikman-Scalese, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, David McAuley, Greg Shatan, Gifffin Barnett, Herb Waye, Isabel Rutherfurd, John Laprise, Markus Kummer, Niels ten Oever (10)
Observers/Guests: Mark Carvell
Staff: Bernie Turcotte, Brenda Brewer, Ergys Ramaj
Apologies: Avri Doria
** If your name is missing from attendance or apology, please send note to acct-staff@icann.org **
Transcript
Recording
Agenda
1. Administriva including Roll call, absentees, SOI, etc
2. Review of Public Comments
3. AOB
Documents
Raw Captioning Notes
CART Disclaimer: This rough edit transcript, which may contain missing, misspelled or paraphrased words, is only provided for your immediate review and is not certified as verbatim and is not to be cited in any way.
Decisions:
- (none)
Action Items:
- (none)
Requests:
- Participants asked to read the complete comments from the governments of Brazil, Switzerland and the UK for further discussions at the next meeting.
Chat Transcript
Brenda Brewer: (7/18/2017 13:40) Welcome to Human Rights Subgroup Meeting #26 on 18 July 2017 @ 19:00 UTC!
Brenda Brewer: (13:40) If you are not speaking, please mute your phone by pressing *6 (star 6). This call is recorded.
Brenda Brewer: (13:41) Reminder to all, please speak slowly and state your name before speaking for the Captioner. Thank you!
Marie Fresch: (13:56) I can hear the audio
Marie Fresch: (13:56) thank you
Jamie- CART support: (13:57) who will the main speaker be?
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (13:57) Hello all
Niels ten Oever: (13:57) Me
Jamie- CART support: (13:58) thank you
Niels ten Oever: (13:58) Hi all
Markus Kummer: (13:58) Hi all
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (13:58) 2 minute warning is clear and lound
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (13:59) loud
Niels ten Oever: (13:59) Must me my enthusiasm ;)
Niels ten Oever: (13:59) will put volume a bit lower
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (13:59) At least we have our 5 people so the 55 rule is met
David McAuley: (13:59) I am #3200
Brenda Brewer: (14:00) Thank you, David!
David McAuley: (14:00) I have a summer intern with me, Jonathan Peyster, and a new Verisign colleague, Nik Smith
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:00) welcome all
David McAuley: (14:05) please mute
David McAuley: (14:05) agree with that, Niels
Anne Aikman-Scalese: (14:06) Please unmute me. I have muted my own phone.
Brenda Brewer: (14:06) umnuted, Anne.
Anne Aikman-Scalese: (14:06) Thanks Brenda.
Brenda Brewer: (14:07) You're welcome.
Brenda Brewer: (14:07) For the record, no answer to Kavouss' dial out.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:08) clarification would be appreciated and useful
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:08) Te
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:09) this is an SSAC not ALAC comment... yes
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:09) Corrected to SSAc in master document
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:10) the Bernie
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:10) Niels please slow down a bit for the captioning
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:17) makes sense Anne... so for the attention of the full ccwg
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:24) old
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:28) Balancing
David McAuley: (14:28) Greg is saying better what I meant to say
Mark Carvell: (14:30) Agree seems beyond WG remit as it is a fundamental position about how core values may interact so onevalue might override another. Suggest Brazil raises this in anotherICANN forum.
Greg Shatan: (14:31) This would also open up a Pandora's Box of issues about which core value is more important, what aspect of ICANN's mission is more "core", etc., etc.
David McAuley: (14:34) The 'customary' language would undercut bylaw language
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:41) time Check - 19 minutes left in the call
Herb Waye Ombuds: (14:42) Sorry for the late arrival... Hay season, when the farmer says bring me a wagon one drops everything and brings the hay wagon...
Anne Aikman-Scalese: (14:46) This is tough because ICANN is not a "business". And there are limitations in the approved ByLaw relating to "no obligation beyond applicable law." I wonder whether ICANN should simply be advisingg businesses with which it interacts of the Ruggie Principles and/or according extra points for an application that agrees to implement Ruggie. But in fact these are also issues of implementation, as is the idea of an HRIA.
Mark Carvell: (14:46) Swiss and UK governments are in line on Ruggie - when it comes to GAC preparing its response as CO can expect this discussion to be re-visited.
David McAuley: (14:47) hard to hear
Greg Shatan: (14:47) +1 David
David McAuley: (14:47) better
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:47) agreed
David McAuley: (14:49) suggest we stick to bylaw language
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (14:49) yep
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:50) Time Check - 10 minutes left in call
David McAuley: (14:51) Greg is right - the challenged language is in the bylaw,
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:55) Note - Next meeting of the HR group is Tuesday 25 July 1900UTC
Greg Shatan: (14:56) Need to look back at our documents to weigh these comments.
Herb Waye Ombuds: (14:57) Bye all
Anne Aikman-Scalese: (14:57) THank you.
Bernard Turcotte - ICANN: (14:57) bye all
David McAuley: (14:57) Thanks Niels, all bye
Greg Shatan: (14:57) bye!
Mark Carvell: (14:57) Thanks for careful consideration. Bye!