Work Team C 02.03.11 Action Items

WT C ACTION ITEMS:  16 FEBRUARY 2011

Dev to check with Alejandro regarding meaning of these points from LACRALO in SWOT A. Weaknesses:

• RALO in support of a pattern or policy favoring a single provider or provider group. (For example with new gTLDs, ccTLDs used like generics, and other changes in the domain names):  This point might be dealing with capture.  Can use word “capture” to reword, but be careful, delicate in how use it.
• Lack of mechanisms for transparency and accountability within and between ALSes:  Keep this point.  
• Lack of minimum requirements for the incorporation of the At-Large ALSes (Annual Report, statutes approved by competent authorities, recent activities).
  

Seth to reword as the recognition of a weakness in LACRALO’s SWOT A:  Lack of minimum requirements for the incorporation of the At-Large ALSes… and the three subpoints we’re putting under it to clarify. 

     -  Completed.

Gareth to clarify following NARALO opportunity in SWOT A with ALS that provided it:  Leadership role in providing foundation grants ( ICANN Is a 501C) to less fortunate groups,  Note the World Wide Web Foundation efforts to promote entrepreneurship in the Third World.

Seth to edit following NARALO opportunity in SWOT A:  Leadership role in providing foundation grants ( ICANN Is a 501C) to less fortunate groups,  Note the World Wide Web Foundation efforts to promote entrepreneurship in the Third World. 

• Make it more precise; it could be related to encouraging growth of a number of ALSes.

      -  Completed.

Once Olivier and Tijani have mapped SWOT analyses points to WT C Simplified Outline recommendation tasks and have developed proposals, Seth to review whether or not WT C has at least one proposal for each recommendation task. 

      -  In progress.