/
12 September 2012 Meeting

12 September 2012 Meeting

Owned by Berry Cobb
Sept 12, 2012

The next call is scheduled on 12 September 2013, 18:00 UTC .  (Scheduled for 60 Min)

11:00 PDT, 13:00 CDT, 14:00 EDT, 20:00 CET, 06:00 Sydney (16.11)

for other places see:

 

Adobe Connect room:

http://icann.adobeconnect.com/r1onj8cflqp/

Agenda:

  1. Review of feedback on possible approaches
  2. Discussion
  3. Next Steps

Open Action Items:

  1. None

Remaining WG Schedule:

TBD

 

Adobe Chat Transcript:

Nathalie  Peregrine:GNSO RCRC/IOC Drafting Team Meeting Agenda 12 September, 2012

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Jim Bikoff has joined the audio

  Alan Greenberg:I'm having trouble hearing everyone including Nathalie and operatorl. Will hang up and try again.

  Nathalie  Peregrine:If you would like a dial out, we can set one up, Alan?

  Alan Greenberg:No. waiting for operator now.

  Nathalie  Peregrine:alright

  Alan Greenberg:back now.

  Alan Greenberg:Much better so far.

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Avri Doria has joined the call

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Osvaldo Novoa has joined

  Osvaldo Novoa:Hello everyone, I'm trying to establish the telephone call

  Nathalie  Peregrine:do you need a dial out Osvaldo?

  Osvaldo Novoa:No, thank you, I'm waiting for the operator, I'm still on hold

  Osvaldo Novoa:I'm on line now

  Nathalie  Peregrine:perfect

  avri:i'll note that we have already avoided starting the PDP for a month or so now.

  avri:we are spending our time on this thread instead of getting cracking on the PDP

  avri:are we going to take them back from the incumbents?

  avri:will the incumbents give back the names if the PDPD decides that they should be protected?

  avri:I would think they should need to agree to that befoare they make policy for new gTLDs

  Chuck Gomes:There is no distinction in registry agreements between public policy and policy.

  avri:that registered and should not have been is decided in the PDP

  Chuck Gomes:I agree that we should start a PDP quickly.

  jeff neuman:@chuck -  I am just relaying information that I heard...

  jeff neuman:As far as the PDP, we are waiting for the final issues report

  jeff neuman:which should come out next week

  avri:Lanre: how can you have a consensus when you do not have a consensus.  one call does not make consensus

  avri:Chuck: and I have given a certain amount of comment.  one thing that might have been easier was a recommendation to new gTLD that they treate these names a reserved voluntarily in the meantime.  but for the incumbent to put this restriction on the now gTLD is problematic.

  avri:... on the new gTLD - we wish those were now gTLDs

  Chuck Gomes:The Council should initiate a PDP and ask that the charter be developed.  The addition of IOC/RC names to the PDP could be added to the charter fairly easily.

  avri:the IGOs have been waiting for many years longer.

  avri:i do not see it as a compromise

  avri:it is either unfair or it opens the flood gates and it is PDP that make this sort of decsion.

  avri:yeah, but calling a moratorrium the onus is only on new gTLDs.

  avri:if it went on the reserved names then it would opne question ot what actions the incumbents should take.

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Please state names for the transcript, thank you!

  avri:well, between the too calls, you may have near consensus, but you certainly don't have consensus.  And you have at least one strong viewpoint against.

  Osvaldo Novoa:The ISPCP had a meeting last week and we support J. Scott compromise

  Kiran Malancharuvil:what about "non registrable?"

  avri:NCSG beleive it can olny be done via a PDP

  avri:i would be shocked if the PDPD wasn't approved.  the issue is the charter.

  Kiran Malancharuvil:Can we get the document that's on the screen?

  Kiran Malancharuvil:via email?

  Kiran Malancharuvil:chat = kiran

  Kiran Malancharuvil:voice = jim

  Kiran Malancharuvil:but no biggie

  Kiran Malancharuvil:good luck!