Chat Transcript

>  Matt Ashtiani: (3/24/2014 13:45) HI all, welcome to the

>Cross-Community Working Group on Internet Governance in NETmundial

>  Matt Ashtiani: (13:45) Hello, my name is Matt Ashtiani and I will be

>monitoring this chat room. In this role, I am the voice for the remote

>participants, ensuring that they are heard equally with those who are

>³in-room² participants. Please note that I will only be able to read

>your comment/question within the time set by the Chair of this session;

>I will not be able to read your comment or question on the mic if they

>are sent after the session/subject is closed by the Chair.

>  Matt Ashtiani: (13:45) The chat rooms are the virtual meetings¹ for

>everyone, in-room and remote. When submitting a question that you want

>me to read out loud on the mic,  please start with a <QUESTION> and end

>with a ³</QUESTION>². Text outside these quotes will be considered as

>part of ³chat² and will not be read out loud on the mic.

>  Matt Ashtiani: (13:45) Please note that chat sessions are being

>archived and follow the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior:

>http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/expected-standards

>  Matt Ashtiani: (13:45) A copy of today's agenda can be found here:

>http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-ccwg-ig

>  Matt Ashtiani: (13:47) A copy of the NetMundial Brazil Meeting CCWG

>Document can be downloaded here:

>http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-ccwg-ig/presentation-netmu

>ndi

>al-24mar14-en

>  Matt Ashtiani: (13:48) A copy of the contribution submitted to

>NetMundial can be downloaded here

>http://content.netmundial.br/files/295.pdf

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:05) Are there any remote participants that would

>like to make a comment or ask a question?

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:17) Are there any remote participants that would

>like to make a comment or ask a question?

>  Michael R. Graham: (14:18) <Comment> It may be useful for this Work

>Group, as well as for other groups -- constituencies, ACs and SOs

>within ICANN -- to develop a set of generally understood definitions of

terms.

>I note that the GNSO's Policy and Implementation Work Group

>acknowledged that the variety of definitions actually became the

>subject of deliberations, rather than their language.  The PIWG

>therefore developed a set of "working definitions" of terms accompanied

>by definitions we agreed to adopt for our discussions with the

>understanding that our final report might incorporate different

>definitions. Perhaps ICANN needs a Johnson to set down definitions of our

language.

>  Michael R. Graham: (14:18) </Comment>

>  Michael R. Graham: (14:19) @Matt -- Sound redundant?

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:22) @michael - thank you for your comment, i will

>notify the chair

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:23) @michael - redundancy is not for me to decide,

>it's your comment :)

>  harish pillay: (14:27) 100 years? I've got more hope.

>  Michael R. Graham: (14:39) @Matt -- thanks for reading that.

>  ksraju: (14:45) we require new model and new frame work on open

>standards  with out developing world participation things will be

>different.

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:45) Are there any remote participants that would

>like to make a comment or ask a question?

>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond: (14:45) @Michael: thank you for your comment.

>Noted!

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:46) @michael - no problem!

>  ksraju: (14:58) harish if we safe garurd internet for next 40 years

>it enough

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:59) Thank you all for participating today.

>  Matt Ashtiani: (14:59) As a reminder, If you are participating

>remotely and have a question for the Public Forum, please use

>forum@icann.org to submit your questions anytime.