Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Recommendation 32

That ICANN define “cultural diversity” and that relevant metrics (encompassing geographic, gender, age group and cultural, possibly by using birth language) be monitored and published. 

Working Party (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness): 
Staff (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness):
  • Accept As-Is
  • Accept With modification
  • Reject

Rationale:

MK: Accept as-is, although it would be helpful to define who 'ICANN' is in this context. Is the ICANN Board expected to undertake this initiative with the involvement of all SO/ACs? Is this expected to be a staff-led effort?

Basis for Assessment: 
Work in Progress:

CCWG-Accountability has had recent discussions on the topic of diversity (see http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp3/2015-July/thread.html).

Expected Completion Date for Work in Progress: 
Milestones: 
Responsibility: 

 

 

Recent updates

Show More Please wait
  • No labels