Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 12 Next »

 No.RecommendationRecipientThematic Group SourceAssigneesStatus
 6ICANN’s MSM should serve as the reference in encouraging all participants (individuals or parties) to declare and update existing or potential conflicts-of-interest, each time a vote takes place or consensus is sought.ICANN Board; ICANN Staff; ICANN CommunityTG1
  • IANA Transition & ICANN Accountability

ON HOLD

 


Actions: 

  • : Assignees to modify the wording of this recommendation  


Notes: 

    • It seems to be a standard practice as it is reflected in the way that working groups and the Board conduct their work. 
    • It is uncertain whether all participants explicitly declare and update existing or potential conflicts-of-interests. This request doesn't seem to be included in the CCWG-Accountability Report. 

    • The wording of this recommendation seems to be a bit over-reaching. We may not want to have all members to declare conflicts of interests during every single vote. We, however, expect members to update their conflicts of interests regularly. 
    • Re conflicts of interests updates, it seems that every community group has some type of rules (e.g. SOIs in GNSO, ALAC) that are appropriate to what they are doing. 
    • Conflict of interests issues will be dealt with by CCWG-Accountability WS2? 
  • No labels