Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Version History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
ISSUE: A.5 |
Prohibition on registrar cybersquatting |
|
Priority:
|
RAA Final Report (High Priority Item) |
|
Issue/Request |
RAA-DT:
1) Incorporate terms in the RAA that explicitly prohibit cybersquatting
2) Currently, the violation of RAA Section 3.7.2 entitled “applicable laws and government regulations” by registrars is a breach of the RAA. Under section 5.3.4 a registrar has fifteen working days after ICANN gives notice of a breach to cure. A violation of RAA Section 3.7.2 is the type of offense that should result in immediate termination of the RAA. Therefore, insert in RAA Section 5.3.2 the right to immediately terminate the RAA when a registrar violates RAA Section 3.7.2 or the prohibition against cybersquatting.
3) Adopt a Registrar Code of Conduct (RAA 3.7.1) that incorporates provisions to achieve similar results.
4) Amend RAA to require Registrar to provide ICANN with list of pending litigation or claims alleging cybersquatting.
5) Termination of accreditation |
Source:
RAA-DT Final Report |
Notes |
Additional information regarding requests: N/A |
Source:
|
Discussion Points |
Description |
Date Discussed |
|
- The negotiating teams discussed (i) the definition of cybersquatting; and (ii) possible evidentiary standards to be used in connection with a specific RAA prohibition against cybersquatting.
|
2 December 2011 |
Proposed Text |
Open |
|
Status/Outcome |
Under Discussion |
|
Explanation |
Open |
|
COMMENTS: |
Comments may be submitted using the “Add Comment” feature below. |
|