...
Meeting Number: AL.AF/CC.14 BDB 0919/1
...
How can I participate in this meeting?
Comment participer a cette teleconference?
Conference ID: FR 1838 / EN 1638
Zoom room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/778651758
...
Action Items: EN
Transcript: EN, FR
Recording: EN, FR
Zoom Chat: EN
...
Participants:
FR: Etienne Tshishimbi, Minata Minata Zong-Naba, Bakary Kouyate, Gabriel Bombambo Boseko, Fanny Salyou, Helen Omoragbon, Aziz Hilali, Michel Tchonang, Gabdibe Gab-Hingonne, Ramanou Biaou,
EN: Mohamed ElBashir, Seun Ojedeji, Helen Omoragbon, Mistura Aruna, Remmy El Bashir, Seun Ojedeji, Remmy Nweke, Moriam Omowunmi Sulaimon, Nkem Nkem Nweke, Barrack Otieno, Vernatius Okwu Ezeama, Joanna Kulesza, Omar Shuran, Abdalmonem Galila, Ben Kyemba, Haroun Mahamat Cherif, Tijani Ben Jemma, Yaovi Atohoun, Sarata Omane, Balutife Adisa, Abdulkarim , Abdulkarim Oloyede, Oreoluwa Lesi, Isaac Maposa, Dave Kissoondoyal, Raymond Mamattah, Jules Nizeyimana, Emmanuel Mfitumukiza, Caleb Ogundele, Hadia Eliminawi, Bob Ochieng, Liz Orembo, Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, Daniel Nanghaka, Ejikeme Egbuogu, Chokri Ben Romdhane, Femi Falobi, Otunte Otueneh, Joan Katambi, Sarah Kiden,
Apologies: Olivier Kouami, Mary Uduma, Jonathan Zuck, Pastor Peters Omoragbon, Bram Fudzulani, Fatimata Seye Sylla,
...
- Roll call (Staff) – 2 min
- Review of action items from previous meeting (Mohamed, Fatimata, Sarah, Staff) – 3 min
- Introduction to the At-Large Policy Platform - Jonathan Zuck - 5 min
Presentation - Open ICANN Public Comments (Mohamed) – 5 min
At-Large Policy Resources
At-Large Capacity Building Workshop - An Introduction to Policy Development at ICANN
2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
At-Large Policy Summary
At-Large Executive Summary page
Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project
The ALAC considers the issue of Name Collision in the DNS an area of importance for the minimization of unintended consequences for Internet end users. The ALAC appreciates the need to have a Name Collision definition for purposes of scoping the inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP), in order for the NCAP Study One to be manageable and on point, and therefore supports the Proposed Definition of Name Collision and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project of 1 July 2019. Of particular importance to us are:
...
(2) The possibility of amending the Definition of Name Collision and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project should further pertinent information come to light at a later stage either through the ongoing work of the NCAP DG, NCAP Working Party and/or input obtained from the party/ies eventually contracted to undertake NCAP Study One.
Evolving the Governance of the Root Server System
The ALAC strongly supports the overall proposal and appreciates the opportunity to comment. The RSS, according to RRSAC37, needs to evolve so it remains a reliable, resilient, and sustainable service in the face of increasing traffic and cyberattacks. However, the ALAC finds it difficult to accept that ICANN is not considered a primary stakeholder with regard to the RSS, given that the Domain Name System and its reliable and trusted operation is a prime reason for ICANN’s existence. The ALAC also encourages that Internet users, the ultimate user and beneficiary of the DNS, should be listed as having a stake in the existence and evolution of the RSS.
The financial model is also of some concern to the ALAC. No figures are provided to allow even order-of-magnitude estimates. It is surely time that we begin to understand exactly what level of funding will be required and hypothesize on where such funding will come from.
Draft Financial Assumptions & Projections and Operating Initiatives for the development of Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Operating & Financial Plan
The ALAC considered the Draft Financial Assumptions, Projections and Operating Initiatives, and offered comments on the following topics among others:
...
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
Amazon Public Interest Commitments (PICs) 2019 See: Presentation by Marita Moll |
|
| |||||||
Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework See: GPI Toolkit |
|
| TBC | ||||||
| Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps |
|
|
...
a. Update and discuss on ATLAS III and AFRALO participation (Fatimata) - 5 min
...
c. AFRALO Newsletter update (Remmy Kouami, Olivier Kouami, Sarah) - 5 min
6. New At-Large Structure (ALS) & individual member applications (Sarah, Mohamed, Fatimata) – 5 min
...
- L'appel - Liste de Présence(Personnel) – 2 min
- Revue des mesures de suivi de la réunion précédente (Mohamed, Fatimata, Sarah) – 5 min
- Introduction à la plate-forme de stratégie At-Large - Jonathan Zuck & Joanna Kulesza
Presentation TBD . Ouverture des commentaires publics d' ICANN (Mohamed) – 5 min
...
At-Large Ressources Directives
ALAC 2019 - Commentaires & Suggestions politiques
Résumé de ligne d'action At-Large
Résumé Exécutif At-large
Graphique d'evolution des recommendations des multi-parties prenantes
Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project
The ALAC considers the issue of Name Collision in the DNS an area of importance for the minimization of unintended consequences for Internet end users. The ALAC appreciates the need to have a Name Collision definition for purposes of scoping the inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP), in order for the NCAP Study One to be manageable and on point, and therefore supports the Proposed Definition of Name Collision and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project of 1 July 2019. Of particular importance to us are:
...
(2) The possibility of amending the Definition of Name Collision and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collision Analysis Project should further pertinent information come to light at a later stage either through the ongoing work of the NCAP DG, NCAP Working Party and/or input obtained from the party/ies eventually contracted to undertake NCAP Study One.
Evolving the Governance of the Root Server System
The ALAC strongly supports the overall proposal and appreciates the opportunity to comment. The RSS, according to RRSAC37, needs to evolve so it remains a reliable, resilient, and sustainable service in the face of increasing traffic and cyberattacks. However, the ALAC finds it difficult to accept that ICANN is not considered a primary stakeholder with regard to the RSS, given that the Domain Name System and its reliable and trusted operation is a prime reason for ICANN’s existence. The ALAC also encourages that Internet users, the ultimate user and beneficiary of the DNS, should be listed as having a stake in the existence and evolution of the RSS.
The financial model is also of some concern to the ALAC. No figures are provided to allow even order-of-magnitude estimates. It is surely time that we begin to understand exactly what level of funding will be required and hypothesize on where such funding will come from.
Draft Financial Assumptions & Projections and Operating Initiatives for the development of Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Operating & Financial Plan
The ALAC considered the Draft Financial Assumptions, Projections and Operating Initiatives, and offered comments on the following topics among others:
...
Commentaire public pour décision
None
Déclarations actuelles (conseil, commentaire ou communication d'ALAC)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
Amazon Public Interest Commitments (PICs) 2019 See: Presentation by Marita Moll |
|
| |||||||
Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework See: GPI Toolkit |
|
| TBC | ||||||
| Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps |
|
|
...
a. Information et discussion sur ATLAS III et la participation d'AFRALO (Fatimata) - 5 min
...
c. A propos du bulletin d'information AFRALO (Remmy Nweke, Olivier Kouami, Sarah) - 5 min
6. Nouvelles demandes de Structure At-Large (ALS) et les candidatures individuelles (Sarah, Mohamed, Fatimata) - 5min
...