Content Comparison

...

1. Welcome
2. Roll Call
3. Statements of Interest
4. Responses From SO/ACs (IPC and any others received at: 13 Community Input ) and relevant documents: Briefing on the study (see below)
5. Review Work Plan and Consider Next Steps
6. AOB

...

1.  Responses from SOs/ACs: Continue to review questions from EWG on IRD (at 4 Proposed Questions and Taxonomies) and other relevant documentsReview relevant documents  and think about what may be missing (other than response from Registrar SG).

2.  The Chairs should encourage the WG members who are from the Registrar SG to participate in the WG meetings.

3.   Develop slides for London: 1) update for GNSO Council; 2) slides for public meeting

Review the revised London Update slides.

...

For Review:

1. Public comment review tool T&T - 29 May2014.doc
2. Summary of Current Status/Next Steps (Stock Taking) 17 April 2014
   
3. A Model for Exploring WHOIS Accuracy (by Margie Milam)
4. Interim Report from the Expert Working Group on Internationalized Registration Data 10 April 2014
5. Status update report from the EWG on gTLD Directory Services 11 November 2013
6. WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification part of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement

...

1.  WHOIS Review Team Internationalized Registration Data Expert Working Group: https://icann-community.icannatlassian.orgnet/wiki/displayspaces/whoisird/WHOIS+RT+IRD+WG+Homeoverview
2. Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services