Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Instructions for WG Members: Please submit your contribution as a comment at the bottom of the page and Staff will include it in the table.

From the Charter:

Impact on privacy and data protection: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect privacy and data protection, also taking into account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?

Information relevant to this subject that will assist the WG to make a determination whether for this particular topic 'thick' Whois would be beneficial or not:

Relevant sectionSourceSubmitted byDate of submission
Proponents of thick Whois point to ICANN's community-developed "Procedure For Handling Whois Conflicts with Privacy Law" http://www.icann.org/en/processes/icann-procedure-17jan08.htm as a means for resolving any potential situations where a registry operator's Whois obligations are alleged to be inconsistent with local legal requirements concerning data privacy. Also it could be argued that, as indicated above, all of the data that might be published by a thick registry is already public data since it would already be published by the registrar.http://icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/thick-thin-whois-30may09-en.pdfMarika21 November
ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Agreement obligates registrars to ensure that each registrant is notified and consents to the purposes and recipients of any personal data collected from the registrant in association with every domain registrationhttp://icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/thick-thin-whois-30may09-en.pdfMarika21 November
    
  • No labels