CCT Meeting #62 - 27 October 2017 (ICANN60)
Reading List/Discussion Documents
Friday, 27 October 2017 09:00 - 17:30 GST | 05:00 - 13:00 UTC |
---|
Attendees:
Team: Jonathan Zuck, Laureen Kapin, Jordyn Buchanan, Gongalwe Moseu, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Calvin Browne, Fabro Stiebel, David Taylor, Waudo Siganga, Dejan Dukic, Kaili Kan, Carlton Samuels
Guests:
Observers: Margie Milam, Karen Lentz, Alice Jansen, Negar Farzinnia, Lars Hoffman
ICANN Org: Antonietta Mangiacotti, Eleeza Agopian, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez
Apologies: Jamie Hedlund, Megan Richards
Agenda:
09:00 – 09:10 Welcome, roll call, Statement of Interest updates and opening remarks: Jonathan
09:10 – 10:15 Review of current status of draft report recommendations : Jean-Baptiste
- Walk-through and report based on subteam work on updating/consolidating recommendations for the final report
- Recommendations format
10:15 - 10:30 Break
10:30 – 12:00 Review and approve (consolidated) Competition Draft Report Recommendations: Jordyn
- Rec. 2-6, 11: Jordyn
- Rec. 7, 8, 12: Dejan
- Rec. 9: Waudo
- Rec. 10: Jordyn/David
12:00 – 12:30 Review and approve Application & Evaluation Draft Report Recommendations: Jonathan
- Rec. 43 – 50: Jonathan
12:30 - 13:15 Review Team Lunch
13:15 - 15:15 Review and approve (consolidated) Safeguards & Trust Draft Report Recommendations: Laureen
- Rec. 13, 15, 33: Gao
- Rec 14, 16, 25-30: Laureen
- Rec 17,18, 20, 24: Calvin
- Rec 19, 34, 37, 38, 39: Drew
- Rec 21, 22, 23: Carlton
- Rec 31, 32: Fabro
- Rec 35: Jamie
- Rec.36: Carlos
- Rec. 40, 41, 42: David
15:15 - 15:30 Break
15:30 – 16:00 Determine updates needed to final report: All
- Review and reach consensus on identified updates needed
16:00 – 17:00 Engagement Session preparations: All
17:00 – 17:15 Roadmap to Final Report: Jonathan, Jordyn, Laureen
- Schedule of Calls
- Adoption of Public Comment Shell
- Workplan
17:15 – 17:30 A.O.B. and review of action items/decisions reached: Jonathan
Documents:
Recordings:
Transcript: EN
Notes/Action Items
Draft Report
- All to maintain survey recommendations and consider consolidating all recommendations that reference topics related to asking consumers for their sense of trust, etc. in domains (i.e. recs. 9, 11, 13)
- Rec. 5: Jonathan to provide an updated version of the parking paper based on today’s discussion. DONE
- Rec 12. and 24 are separate: Dejan sent updated language for Rec 12. Jean-Baptiste to update PowerPoint. DONE
- Consolidate recommendations 13, 35, 33 into a single end-user survey: Laureen to consider whether it will be a part of the earlier larger recommendation on conducting a single end-user survey. Jordyn to consolidate registrant survey recommendations and Laureen to address end-user survey recommendations for possible consolidation.
- Rec. 14 (assigned to David Taylor): Rewriting it to include removal of barriers to diversity (i.e. more niche TLDs or other business models?) to incentivize it rather than encouraging a particular business model.
- Rec 16: Carlos and Laureen to refocus recommendation to focus on data collection needed for the next review team rather than a study. Carlos to move some of the text in Rec 16 to the analysis section.
- Rec. 25-30: ICANN org to reach out to Subsequent Procedures leadership and ask where they are in their highly regulated strings discussion. As it will influence priority level for the recommendation -- does it need to be completed in time for Subsequent Procedures PDP WG to address in its work?
- Rec 32, and 33: Stay as is.
- Rec 35: remove recommendation, pending Jamie’s review. Delete rec 36. Some of rationale from recs 35 and 36 should be included in rec 14 or elsewhere in the text. i.e. Observations about risks and costs and benefits in the text.
- Rec. 40: Jordyn to draft text (by Monday 30 Oct - OVERDUE) to capture discussion on registrant survey with INTA Survey (rec. 40).
Final Report
- Executive Summary: Jonathan to include a section on conclusions about the program
- Final numbering of recommendations: Restart with clear numbering and digestible way of reporting recommendations. Add a paragraph under the public comment section in the appendix “review process” describing which recommendations were consolidated based on the input received from comments.
- Recommendation summary: add a column with level of consensus.
- Finish consolidation exercise, circle back to staff for a cost analysis of the new/consolidated recommendations, CCTRT to determine whether each recommendation is worth/not the cost, and if it’s not then delete.
- Review Team to identify any sections in the draft report that need to be updated based on public comments received, and all to compare public comment sheet to apply changes.
- Set up discussion after ICANN60 with ICANN org on standardizing recommendation language so they may be translated into Board resolutions.
- ICANN Org to review and clarify to Jonathan how a subset of the team is maintained to help with recommendations’ implementation after conclusion of the review?