Team:   Jonathan Zuck, Kaili Kan, Laureen Kapin, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Jordyn Buchanan, Waudo Siganga, Jamie Hedlund, Calvin Browne, Carlton Samuels, Dejan Djukic, Drew Bagley, Gao Mosweu, Megan Richards

Observers: Zack Coleman

Staff:  Pamela Smith, Brenda Brewer, Brian Aitchison, Eleeza Agopian, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez, Margie Milam, Antonietta Mangiacotti

Apologies:  

Agenda:  

a. Welcome, roll-call, SoI
b. Reach consensus on recommendations for:
     o Consumer Trust - Laureen
     o Public Interest Commitments - Drew
     o Application and Evaluation Process – Jonathan
     o Benefits vs. Confusion to End Users - Megan

c. A.O.B.

Documents:

• VIII. Voluntary PICs
• IX. Application and Evaluation Process
• IX. Effectiveness of the String Contention Process
• V. Benefits vs Confusion to end users
• Work plan - NEW DEADLINE

Recordings:

• Adobe Connect

• mp3

Chat Transcript:  EN

Transcript:  EN

Notes and Action Items:

• Consumer Trust Paper:

Edits pending

• PIC Paper:

 - Res. 1 - no objections

 - Res. 2 - keep rec as written pending JB's informal survey

 - Res. 3 - replace existing recommendation that emphasizes rationale that members of the community receive PICs in an appropriate timeframe

• Benefits v. Confusion:

Recs: Refine terminology, remove last recommendation, ask for refining input from other team members - Laureen to review with edits/refinements