At-Large Small Team on ALAC Objection Procedure for Next Round

At-Large Small Team on ALAC Objection Procedure for Next Round

Objective & Task:

This small team will review the 2012 ALAC Procedure for filing Comments and Objections to New gTLD string applications, and consider:

(a) whether this Procedure requires an overhaul to address administrative challenges faced in its use for the 2012 New gTLD Round*; and

(b) whether this Procedure could be updated to present less complexity and bureaucracy.

The output of this small team would be a Next Round ALAC Procedure, to be approved by the ALAC for onward submission to the Subsequent Procedures Implementation Review Team (SubPro IRT) for incorporation or reference in the Next Round Applicant Guidebook (AGB).

*Note: The issue of 'automatic standing' is being taken up via CPWG.

Criteria to be Met for the Next Round ALAC Procedure:

  1. Bottom-up development of potential objections,

  2. Discussion and approval of objections at the Regional At-Large Organization (RALO) level, and

  3. A process for consideration and approval of the objection by the At-Large Advisory Committee.

Small Team Timeline (tentative)

  • OFB WG 1st round comments – 5- 19 July

  • OFB – WG Leadership Topic Leads to propose updated procedure based on the comments received (22 July- 7 August)

  • Discussion with OFB- 2nd round of comments – 8- August – 5 Sep

  • OFB-WG – Leadership Topic leads to settle updated Procedure based on comments received (9 Sep – 0ct 21)

  • OFB – WG finalizes procedure and sends to ALAC for vote – (24 Oct- 29 October)

  • ALAC Vote –30 October - 1 Nov  - ALAC Endorsement

  • Prior to ICANN81: Submission to the Subsequent Procedures IRT

Small Team Composition

Small team members 

RALO 

Dev Anand Teelucksingh - lead 

LACRALO

Justine Chew - ALAC Representative to SubPro IRT

Ex-Officio member

Cheryl Langdon Orr - ALAC Alternate to SubPro IRT

Ex-Officio member

Hadia El Miniawi 

AFRALO

Alan Greenberg 

NARALO 

Jenna Fung

APRALO 

Christelle Vaval

LACRALO

Hannah Frank

LACRALO

Barkha Manral 

APRALO

Emilia Zalewska-Czajczyńska

EURALO

Tijani Ben Jemaa

AFRALO

Mutegeki Cliff

AFRALO

Kathleen Scoggin

NARALO

Amina Ramallan

AFRALO

Ernest Mafuta

AFRALO

Mailing list: alac-objections@icann.org


Next Meeting: 30 April 2025

Last Meeting: 23 April 2025

Previous Meetings

TBD - Approach for Small Team

Comments & Objections Procedures Subteams

Below are the Subteams for the review and revision of ALAC Objection Procedure for the Next Round. 

Workflow Subteam

Objective: Simplify the process workflow to submit comments and file objections while satisfying the criteria set by ICANN. 

Scoring Subteam

Objective: Review how At-Large quantifies whether to proceed with community or limited public interest objection. This involves reviewing DRSP decision on objections and identifying favorable commonalities. This will inform how an At-Large team could score comments and objections received  

Materials: Materials: 

Current documents 

Google doc : ALAC Procedure for Filing Comments and objections in the Next Round

Google doc : ALAC scoring for Community and Public Interest Objections.


REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 

PPT "Next Round of New gTLDs - ALAC Procedure for Filing Comments & Objections" - Presentation to OFB WG - Justine Chew 27 June 2024.

  • Background reading to understand the ALAC Procedures that were used in the 2012 round. See Google docs :

  1. 2012 Procedures for the ALAC to submit public comments on and file objections to the new gTLD applications.
  2. ALAC Objection Funding Instructions for 2012 New gTLD Program
  3. 2012 Procedure for the ALAC to submit public comments on, and file objections to new gTLD applications (PDF)
  4. At-Large new gTLD Application Dashboard Workspace
  5. At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Objection Funding Instructions

  6. The Independent Objector

  7. Wayback archive of Independent Objector website
  8. Objection Determinations -  the list of Objections filed and the determinations made by the Dispute Resolution Service Providers (DRSP) regarding community and limited public interest objections