Spanish Conference ID = 1738
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/578656095
Dial out Participants:
EN: Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Sébastien Bachollet
ES: Sergio Salinas Porto
Apologies: Justine Chew, Marita Moll, Maureen Hilyard, Jonathan Zuck, Satish Babu, Ricardo Holmquist, Glenn McKnight, Holly Raiche, Herb Waye (Ombuds)
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Evin Erdogdu, Yeşim Nazlar
ES Interpreters: Marina and Claudia
Call Management: Yeşim Nazlar
At-Large Policy Resources
2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
At-Large Policy Summary
At-Large Executive Summary page
Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
EPDP Resources
Web Page of EPDP
EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
Keep Up with EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
EPDP Background Documents
Comment:ALAC Statement on Registry Agreement Renewals .org, .biz and .info
The ALAC generally refrained from commenting on these prior proposed Registry Agreement renewals, with the exception of the proposed renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement in 2017. The ALAC in general favors standardizing Registry Agreements as this allows for transparency and predictability, as well as ease of review and compliance monitoring of one standard contract (with necessary but controlled variations through Addendums) instead of managing many disparate/varying contracts. Being supportive of this approach, the ALAC has not objected to the base Registry Agreement, or to its use in prior renewals.
In respect of the intent to standardize the said 3 proposed Registry Agreement renewals (.org, .biz, .info), the ALAC
welcomes the following proposals:
(i) inclusion of Public Interest Commitments (per Specification 11),
(ii) inclusion of Minimum requirements for Rights Protection Mechanisms (per Specification 7),
(iii) adoption of the Registry Code of Conduct (per Specification 9), and
(iv) amendment of the relevant section in Specification 5 to govern the allocation of two-character labels at the second level to avoid confusion with corresponding country codes.
The ALAC also noted there are differences in opinion within At-Large regarding the omission and quantum of price caps.
Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 3 (RZ-LGR-3) Note: CPWG suggested to ALAC "No Statement".
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Proposed Renewal of .asia Registry Agreement |
| ||
| |||
Process Proposal for Streamlining Organizational Reviews |
| TBC |
1. DNS over HTTPS (DOH)
2. Future of Multistakeholder Model of Governance
3. Effectiveness of Specific Review Recommendations
4. Universal Acceptance (UA)
5. Combined EPDP2, GDPR, WHOIS Accuracy and Unified Access Model (UAM)
Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC
Comment:ALAC Statement on Registry Agreement Renewals .org, .biz and .info
The ALAC generally refrained from commenting on these prior proposed Registry Agreement renewals, with the exception of the proposed renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement in 2017. The ALAC in general favors standardizing Registry Agreements as this allows for transparency and predictability, as well as ease of review and compliance monitoring of one standard contract (with necessary but controlled variations through Addendums) instead of managing many disparate/varying contracts. Being supportive of this approach, the ALAC has not objected to the base Registry Agreement, or to its use in prior renewals.
In respect of the intent to standardize the said 3 proposed Registry Agreement renewals (.org, .biz, .info), the ALAC
welcomes the following proposals:
(i) inclusion of Public Interest Commitments (per Specification 11),
(ii) inclusion of Minimum requirements for Rights Protection Mechanisms (per Specification 7),
(iii) adoption of the Registry Code of Conduct (per Specification 9), and
(iv) amendment of the relevant section in Specification 5 to govern the allocation of two-character labels at the second level to avoid confusion with corresponding country codes.
The ALAC also noted there are differences in opinion within At-Large regarding the omission and quantum of price caps.
Comentarios Publicos para decision
Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 3 (RZ-LGR-3) Nota: CPWG sugirió al ALAC "No hay declaración".
Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)
Nombre del Comentario Público | Comentarios del Público Cerrar | Estado | Autor(es) |
---|---|---|---|
Proposed Renewal of .asia Registry Agreement |
| ||
| |||
Process Proposal for Streamlining Organizational Reviews |
| TBC |
1. DNS sobre HTTPS (DOH)
2. Futuro del modelo de gobernanza de múltiples partes interesadas
3. Eficacia de las recomendaciones específicas de revisión
4. Aceptación universal (UA)
5. Modelo combinado de EPDP2, GDPR, Precisión de WHOIS y Acceso Unificado (UAM)