Wednesday, 24 April 2019

Time: 19:00 - 20:30 UTC (for the time in various timezones click here) 

How can I participate in this meeting?   

English Conference ID = 1638

Spanish Conference ID = 1738

AC Room: https://participate.icann.org/cpwg/

Action Items:  EN        

Recording: 

AC Chat: EN

Transcript: 

Dial out Participants: 

EN:  Jonathan Zuck,  Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Nikenley Severe, Holly Raiche

ES:  

Apologies: Alberto Soto, Kaili Kan, John Laprise, Eduardo Diaz, Justine Chew, Alan Greenberg

Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Evin Erdogdu

ES Interpreters: 

Call Management: Andrea Glandon

At-Large Policy Resources

2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
At-Large Policy Summary
At-Large Executive Summary page
Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic

EPDP Resources

Web Page of EPDP
EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data 
Keep Up with EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
EPDP Background Documents

Agenda - EN 

1. Welcome and roll call - Staff (2 minutes)

2. Adoption of agenda, review of Action Items 17 April - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutes)

3. EPDP and Next Steps (including EPDP Phase II) - Hadia Elminiawi (20 minutes)

4. Policy comment updates - Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu and All (45 minutes) 

Recently Ratified by the ALAC

Advice (sent to ICANN Board): GNSO Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Policy Recommendations for ICANN Board Consideration
The ALAC provided advice to the ICANN Board, noting significant concern related to three aspects of the EPDP Report. Specifically, the ALAC is concerned not only with the outcomes, but with the process that was followed to address the issues. All three impact the ability to access registration data and the completeness of that data, specifically: “to identify the appropriate balance for a path forward to ensure compliance with the GDPR while maintaining the existing WHOIS system to the greatest extent possible”. The ALAC advises the ICANN Board to:

• Request that the issue of Thick WHOIS be discussed during the EPDP Phase 2 in light of the new legal opinion;
• Request that the issue of geographic differentiation be re-opened during the EPDP Phase 2 in light of the new legal opinion and the lack of considering the competing needs of privacy vs the benefits of non-redaction on cyber-security activities and that the ensuing discussion factor in the needs of those using the data for cyber-security and other legitimate purposes;
• Request that the issue of legal/natural differentiation be discussed during the EPDP Phase 2 explicitly considering the competing needs of those using the data for cybersecurity and other legitimate purposes;
• Initiate independent studies related to the implementation of geographic and legal/natural differentiation as well as the impact of the Temporary Specification implementation on cyber-security, or request that the EPDP Phase 2 commission such studies. If the latter, the Board should ensure adequate funding for such work.

Public Comment for Decision

None

Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)

*Greg Shatan volunteered to be penholder of an ALAC statement on all 4 Registry Agreement public comments.

5. Any other business (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and All (3 minutes)

6. Next Meeting - Olivier Crepin-Leblond and Staff (2 minutes) 

Agenda - ES

1. Bienvenida y asistencia - Staff (2 minutos)

2. Adopcion de la Agenda, revision de los Items de Accion 17 Abril - Olivier Crepin-Leblond (3 minutos)

3. EPDP y Próximos pasos (incluida la Fase II de EPDP) - Hadia Elminiawi (20 minutos)

4. Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas: Jonathan Zuck, Evin Erdoğdu y Todos (45 minutos)

Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC 

Advice (sent to ICANN Board): GNSO Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Policy Recommendations for ICANN Board Consideration
The ALAC provided advice to the ICANN Board, noting significant concern related to three aspects of the EPDP Report. Specifically, the ALAC is concerned not only with the outcomes, but with the process that was followed to address the issues. All three impact the ability to access registration data and the completeness of that data, specifically: “to identify the appropriate balance for a path forward to ensure compliance with the GDPR while maintaining the existing WHOIS system to the greatest extent possible”. The ALAC advises the ICANN Board to:

• Request that the issue of Thick WHOIS be discussed during the EPDP Phase 2 in light of the new legal opinion;
• Request that the issue of geographic differentiation be re-opened during the EPDP Phase 2 in light of the new legal opinion and the lack of considering the competing needs of privacy vs the benefits of non-redaction on cyber-security activities and that the ensuing discussion factor in the needs of those using the data for cyber-security and other legitimate purposes;
• Request that the issue of legal/natural differentiation be discussed during the EPDP Phase 2 explicitly considering the competing needs of those using the data for cybersecurity and other legitimate purposes;
• Initiate independent studies related to the implementation of geographic and legal/natural differentiation as well as the impact of the Temporary Specification implementation on cyber-security, or request that the EPDP Phase 2 commission such studies. If the latter, the Board should ensure adequate funding for such work.

Comentarios Publicos para decision

Ninguno

Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)

*Greg Shatan se ofreció como voluntario para ser titular de una declaración de ALAC en los 4 comentarios públicos del Acuerdo de Registro.

5. Otros temas (AOB) - Olivier Crepin-Leblond y todos (3 minutos)

6. Siguiente reunion - Olivier Crepin-Leblond y Staff (2 minutos)