Mandate: The group will be responsible for reviewing the completeness and effectiveness of ICANNs internal security processes and the effectiveness of the ICANN security framework.
Workplan: The work plan for this workstream is incorporated into the SSR2 Review Team work plan. View the SSR2 Review Team work plan to see the key areas for research and discussion and related milestones to be achieved during the review process.
Workstream Documents
Date | Document | File |
---|---|---|
19 Jan 2019 | ICANN SSR Questions & Answers | Excel |
12 Dec 2018 | Preamble for team review | Google Doc |
Members:
Mandate: The group will be responsible for reviewing the completeness and effectiveness of ICANNs internal security processes and the effectiveness of the ICANN security framework.
Email Archives - HERE
Workstream task management (Trello): https://trello.com/b/5Eu1ppuv/ssr2-subtopic-2-icann-ssr
Conference calls: https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Subgroup+Conference+Calls
Background Materials:
Subgroup Documents
Date | Document (Versions in Red are latest) | File |
---|---|---|
19 Jan 2019 | ICANN SSR Questions & Answers | Excel |
12 Dec 2018 | Preamble for team review | Google Doc |
| Draft Report - ICANN SSR Subgroup - Meeting in LA | Google Doc |
| LA Meeting - Day 2 notes | Google Doc |
| ICANN SSR Subtopic activities | Google doc |
| Draft Audit Plan: ICANN SSR Workshop 9-10 October | Google doc |
| SS2 Work Plan (including Subgroup Work Plans) | Wiki page |
| ICANN Security Subtopic: Work Plan Draft | Google doc |
Meeting Summary (9-10 October 2017)
The ICANN SSR Subgroup had a very productive two-day, fact-finding meeting at ICANN headquarters in Los Angeles. The subgroup met with a number of ICANN staff subject matter experts and discussed a range of issues relating to the completeness and effectiveness of ICANN’s security processes and the effectiveness of the ICANN security framework (including activities connected to the SSR2 Terms of Reference and implementation of SSR1 recommendations). Topics were covered to varying degrees of detail as warranted; some topics were covered sufficiently and some will require follow-on discussions.
The subgroup reviewed, submitted questions & information requests about, and discussed early observations about:
Decisions
This section is under maintenance
Date | Decision |
---|---|
| Rapporteur: Boban Krsic |