Attendees:

WP Members:  Daniel Nanghaka, KC Claffy, Sebastien Bachollet, Tola Sogbesan

Observers:  /

ICANN Organization:   Jennifer Bryce, Brenda Brewer

Apologies:  Vanda Scartezini

Audio recording:  EN

Zoom recording:  HERE

Transcript:  EN

Zoom Chat Transcript: EN

Documents: 

• Reviews WP Document
• TOR

Decisions Reached:

Action Items:

Agenda:

1. Welcome Remarks (Kc, Daniel)
2. Review of Task Breakdown
   1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qA0iGaBzx_6ieCChGZUn1emxFYqyeJEEQWqeKNN-as/edit?usp=sharing
   2. Delegation of respective questions and tasks to the respective Work Parties and where there is need for collaboration - highlights are made
   3. Three outstanding threads
      1. EPDP: Requested Interview with EPDP previous chair Kurt.
         1. Need to compile list of question: @@
      2. Review of RDS2: Requested interview with Alan Greenberg. Initial list of questions
         1.  1. What were the challenges or bottlenecks in the RDS?
         2.  2. Will there be a possibility to revive the RDS since they were already in the deliberations and the works were halted under the leadership of Chuck Gomes?
         3.   3. What recommendation can you give that can improve on the future of next RDS PDP Process and Requirement gathering?
      3. Review of Accountability Framework
      4. Questions addressed to Martin (Board Rep)
         1. @Action Point: Maarten to consult with Board on whether the ICANN Board convened a Special Community Group, include governance and dispute resolution expertise, to discuss options for improving Board accountability with regard to restructuring of the Independent Review Process (IRP) and the Reconsideration Process
         2. https://gac.icann.org/ <-  if you click on “gac advice’, and then ‘track responses to gac advice in board tracker’, you get taken back to icann.org.  What is the appropriate link to track responses to gac advice?
         3. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-barcelona63-gac-advice-scorecard-27jan19-en.pdf is a static link, and we have no idea how dated it is (what has happened since january), so we need a current link.  Also, we need the GAC’s opinion on whether the recommendation has been met.
3. Collaborative Meetings and recommendation from other Work Parties? Next Work Party will be be joint with Community Work Party.
4. Way Forward
5. Confirm