Comment Close Date | Statement Name | Status | Assignee(s) and | Call for Comments | Call for Comments Close | Vote Announcement | Vote Open | Vote Reminder | Vote Close | Date of Submission | Staff Contact and Email | Statement Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30.04.2014 | IDN Variant TLDs – LGR Procedure Implementation – Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1 | rinalia.abdulrahim | 21.04.2014 | 25.04.2014 23:59 UTC | 28.04.2014 05:00 UTC | 28.04.2014 05:00 UTC | 01.05.2014 | 02.05.2014 23:59 UTC | 03.05.2014 | Naela Sarras naela.sarras@icann.org | AL-ALAC-ST-0514-01-00-EN |
Please click here to download a copy of the pdf below.
ALAC Statement on the IDN Variant TLDs – LGR Procedure Implementation – Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1
The ALAC notes the progress made in the implementation of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules Project, specifically:
We recognize that the project is crucial for ensuring that the Root Zone is able to support IDN variants, which are applicable for scripts and languages used by a large proportion of the world’s population.
We are greatly encouraged by the success of the Arabic script community in forming a Generation Panel to address a script that is shared by many languages across Africa, North Africa, East Asia, South Asia and the Middle East. We are also heartened by indications of mobilization by the Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Indic communities towards forming their script Generation Panels.
Based on our observations, as well as feedback received from various language communities, we wish to highlight some issues of concern that require urgent attention in moving the project forward.
Meeting Demand for IDN TLD
The Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1 covers 18 scripts requested by new IDN gTLD applicants. The Generation Panels that are already formed and in the process of being formed do not match the demand.
We view the lack of response from the Cyrillic, Greek, Georgian, Hebrew, Lao, Latin and Thai communities as of the ICANN 49 meeting in Singapore to be a matter of concern. We urge ICANN to take action to address the gap.
Our recommendations to the ICANN IDN Variant TLD Program Team are as follows:
Feedback on Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1
We commend the Integration Panel for producing a Maximal Starting Repertoire (MSR) in a format that is easy for language communities to understand and use. The MSR clearly outlines three sets of code points: 1) those that are ineligible for the Root Zone, 2) those that should be included, and 3) those that should be excluded based on the rationale provided by the Integration Panel.
We note that the Integration Panel intends to “freeze” the MSR version 1 after this call for public comment. We advise against freezing script segments of the MSR without receiving sufficient input from language communities either via a script Generation Panel or from the script community in general if no Generation Panel has been established.
We request that the Integration Panel provide confirmation to the community that subsequent versions of the MSR may include an expanded set of possible code points based on the review and input received from language communities.
We believe that a version-release timeline should be published for the MSR and LGR (i.e., a designated time period and cycle for releasing updated versions), which can be used by language communities to plan their submissions as well as to expect version updates.
We call on the Integration Panel to ensure that its work does not discriminate against language communities with a smaller number of speakers by limiting letters or characters for inclusion in the Root Zone to only those used by languages spoken by large populations.
(Draft prepared by Rinalia Abdul Rahim and submitted on 19 April 2014)
ALAC Statement on IDN Variant TLDs – LGR Procedure Implementation – Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1
The ALAC notes the progress made in the implementation of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR) Project, specifically:
We recognize that the project is crucial for ensuring that the Root Zone is able to support IDN variants, which are applicable for major languages used by the global population of Internet users.
We are greatly encouraged by the success of the Arabic script community in forming a Generation Panel to address a script that is shared by many languages across Africa, North Africa, East Asia, South Asia and the Middle East. We are also heartened by indications of mobilization by the Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Indic communities towards forming their script Generation Panels.
Based on our observations as well as feedback received from various language communities, we wish to highlight some issues of concern that require urgent attention in moving the project forward.
Meeting Demand for IDN TLD
The Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1 covers 18 scripts requested by new IDN gTLD applicants. The Generation Panels already formed and in the process of being formed do not match the demand.
We view the lack of response from the Cyrillic, Greek, Georgian, Hebrew, Lao, Latin and Thai communities as of the ICANN 49 meeting in Singapore to be a matter of concern. We urge ICANN to take action to address the gap.
Our recommendations to the ICANN IDN Variant TLD Program Team:
Feedback on Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 1
We commend the Integration Panel for producing a Maximal Starting Repertoire (MSR) in a format that is easy for language communities to understand and manage. The MSR clearly outlines the set of code points that is ineligible for the Root Zone. It also clearly outlines the set of code points that the Integration Panel has defined as possible for inclusion as well as those that should be excluded based on provided rationale.
We note that the MSR will serve as a “fixed collection of code points from which Generation Panels may make a selection in constructing the repertoire for their respective LGR proposals” based on what the Integration Panel has determined to be possible for inclusion. We also note that the Integration Panel intends to “freeze” the MSR version 1 after this call for public comment.
We advise against freezing script segments of the MSR without receiving sufficient input from language communities (i.e., via a script Generation Panel or from the script community in general if no Generation Panel has been established).
For subsequent versions of the MSR and LGR, we support the suggestion that there be a designated release timeline (i.e., a designated time period for release of updated versions where language communities can plan their submissions as well as expect updates to be published).
We also request that the Integration Panel provides confirmation that subsequent versions of the MSR may include a superset or expanded set of possible code points based on the review and input received from language communities.
END