I. Suggested Operational Fix |
| Order No. | Proponent | Topic | File | Presentation Date | Status | Updated Proposal |
| 1 | Kristine Dorrain | B. NOTICE 3. Other topics | | | |
|
| 2 | Maxim Alzoba | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | | | |
|
| 3 | Zak Muscovitch | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | | | |
|
| 4 | George Kirikos | F. REMEDIES 4. Other topics | | | |
|
II. Draft Policy Recommendation |
Order No. | Proponent | Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) | File | Tentative Presentation Date | Status | Updated Proposal |
|---|
| 5 | George Kirikos | A. THE COMPLAINT 3. Limited filing period | | | |
|
| 6 | Claudio DiGangi | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | | | | Supplemental Information |
| 7 | George Kirikos | B. NOTICE 1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent) | | | |
|
| 8 | George Kirikos | C. RESPONSE 1. Duration of response period | | | |
|
| 9 | David McAuley | C. RESPONSE (primary topic) 1. Duration of response period == G. APPEAL (secondary topic) 2. De novo review | | | | #36 - merging #9 and #10 URS-Proposal-36.pdf |
| 10 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE (primary topic) 1. Duration of response period == G. APPEAL (secondary topic) 2. De novo review | | | |
| 11 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE 3. Response fee | | | |
|
| 12 | George Kirikos | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General | | | | Revised version sent on 16 Oct 2018 URS-Proposal-35.pdf |
| 13 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | | | |
|
| 14 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | | | | Can be merged
|
| 15 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | | | |
| 16 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies 2. Duration of suspension period | | | | Can be merged
|
| 17 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of suspension period | | | |
| 18 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | | | |
|
| 19 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | | | |
|
| 20 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | | | |
|
| 21 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | | n/a
| | Can be merged |
| 22 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | | | |
| 23 | George Kirikos | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | | | |
|
| 24 | George Kirikos | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | | | | #34 - merging #24 & #25 URS-Proposal-34.pdf |
| 25 | Zak Muscovitch | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | | | |
| 26 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | | | |
|
| 27 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | | | |
|
| 28 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 2. Conflict of interest | | | |
|
| 29 | George Kirikos | M. URS PROVIDERS (no applicable subheading at present) | | | |
|
| 30 | George Kirikos | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP | | | |
|
| 31 | David McAuley | (no applicable subheading at present) | | | |
|
III. Other |
| Order No. | Proponent | Topic | File | Tentative Presentation Date | Status | Updated Proposal |
| 32 | George Kirikos | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP | | | |
|
| 33 | George Kirikos | (no applicable subheading at present) | | | |
|
