Meeting Number: AL.LAC/MT.0820/1
How can I participate in this meeting?
¿Cómo se puede participar en la teleconferencia?
French Conference ID = 1838
Portuguese Conference ID = 5393
Adobe Connect Room: https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/
Dial Out Participants:
ES: Maritza Aguero, Wladimir Davalos
EN:
FR:
PT:
Apologies: Vanda Scartezini
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Claudia Ruiz
Interpreters:
ES:
PT:
FR:
Call Management: Claudia Ruiz
Statements approved by the ALAC
Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process
The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.
Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews
Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation.
Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews
The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.
Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata
The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset.
Statements in process - Drafting, Comment or Vote
Drafting ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model Requested ASAP
Penholder(s): TBC
Comment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.7 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
Penholder(s): Holly Raiche, Jonathan Zuck, Alan Greenberg
Drafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4)
Penholder(s): Jonathan Zuck
Drafting Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains
Penholder(s): satish.babu
Drafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0
Penholder(s): TBC
Statements that seem to be stalled
Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements
New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions
Upcoming Public Comment Requests
August
September
ENGLISH EN
Statements approved by the ALAC
Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process
The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.
Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews
Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation.
Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews
The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.
Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata
The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset.
Statements in process - Drafting, Comment or Vote
Drafting ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model Requested ASAP
Penholder(s): TBC
Comment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.7 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
Penholder(s): Holly Raiche, Jonathan Zuck, Alan Greenberg
Drafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4)
Penholder(s): Jonathan Zuck
Drafting Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains
Penholder(s): satish.babu
Drafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0
Penholder(s): TBC
Statements that seem to be stalled
Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements
New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions
Upcoming Public Comment Requests
August
September