View Source

#editPageLink {display: none !important;}

PROPOSED METRIC SECTION ***STAFF USE ONLY: PLEASE DO NOT EDIT***

1

Metric Description:

2

Notes/Comments:

3

AoC Category:

4

SO/AC Originator:

STAFF INFORMATION/ANALYSIS SECTION

5

Staff Team:

6

Metric Currently Measured?

7

Computation:
(e.g., data elements, formula, numerator, denominator, ratio/percent, periodicity/frequency)

8

Data Owner:
(i.e., party responsible for collecting and publishing metric)

9

Data Reference Source:
(i.e., how/where is the data collected, tracked, managed, and published/produced?)

10

Targets:

SLA:
3-Year:

11

Implementation Considerations:
(e.g., what new or additional resources, tasks, activities, systems, et al., whether internal or external, would be needed to develop, capture, and report this metric?)

12

Degree of Difficulty/Impact:
(i.e., net impact on existing ICANN resources, systems, and capabilities)

13

Estimated Development Cost ($M):

Internal

External

14

Estimated Ongoing Production Costs:
(i.e., incremental to existing funded/budgeted expenditures)

Internal	External

15

Estimated Net Incremental Staff (FTE):
(Express as a fraction and/or range, e.g., .25 - .50)

16

Itemization of Staff Work Effort:
(i.e., list of tasks/activities to support FTE calculation in Q15)

17

Rough Implementation Timeframe:
(e.g., indicate major steps and months/years to complete each one)

Internal	External

18

Critical Dependencies:

19

Anticipated Challenges/Risks:

METRIC EFFECTIVENESS AND UTILITY SECTION

20

Explanation of Metric Effectiveness:
(i.e., how will success/failure enable conclusions to be drawn concerning the relevant AoC definition?)

21

Metric Effectiveness Assessment:
(i.e., vis a vis AoC definition)

22

Overall Feasibility Assessment:

Poor: Low Effectiveness - High Cost
Weak: Low Effectiveness - Low Cost
Potential: High Effectiveness - High Cost
Optimal: High Effectiveness - Low Cost