The process we follow in the ANgWG is

Additionally, the ANgWG has been open to any community member who wants to participate.  But it is enough to work on the topic with the token holder, no one has to join the group to participate in creating a recommendation.  They do need to be in the group to be part of the consensus determination.

 

Status

issue

references

token holder

notes

closed

Digital Archery

 

 

 

closed

TAS and the Glitch

 

 

decided not to pursue

charter
changed

Outreach program for New gTLDs

 

 

ANgWG charter updated to include this item

charter
changed

Outreach program for Applicant Support Program  ANgWG charter updated to include this item
comment
submitted 
Trademark Clearinghouse Hong Xue

Notes from August 2012 Workshop on TMCH by Neustar

Initial draft statement

ICANN's Response to Registry Stakeholder Group's Request for Documentary Information Disclosure on TMCH

ALAC approved comment

closedVertical Integration and Price Caps on Incumbents Alan Greenberg

Statement made by ALAC - No further action at this time

pending"private" generic-word applications Evan Leibovitch

From the AngRG: ... given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group (https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) for discussion and possible policy recommendations.

Discussion - Private gTLDS

completedURS Alan GreenbergDraft initial statement draft