Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (TPR-PDP) - (10) Comments (5 mins) Discussion on Recommendation 33 (5 mins) Recommendation #33 – Request to GNSO for further work on Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy and Potential New Dispute Mechanism - The working group recommends the GNSO request an Issues Report or other suitable mechanism to further research and explore the pros and cons of (i) expanding the TDRP to registrant filers and (ii) creating a new standalone dispute resolution mechanism for registrants who wish to challenge improper transfers, including compromised and stolen domain names. There remains a need for an intermediary mechanism to remedy unauthorized transfers between ToS claw backs and litigation as well as other issues as may be identified by the GNSO. Reference documents: GNSO-TPR Review of Proposed Recommendations Public Comment Review Tool (PCRT) At-Large Workspace Topic for 4 September call GNSO-TPR WG recommendations to Change of Registrant Data (Rec #25-28) Steinar's recommendation is in favor of eliminating Section II from the Transfer Policy; instead, the working group recommends that a standalone “Change of Registrant Data” policy MUST be established, existing outside of the revised Transfer Policy. For the avoidance of doubt, the working group is not recommending a new PDP to establish this standalone policy; instead, the working group is recommending the Change of Registrant Data Policy be created as part of the implementation of these policy recommendations. Q/A At-Large Representatives - ALAC Appointed Representatives: Steinar Grøtterød, Daniel Nanghaka
- ALAC Alternates: Raymond Mamattah, Lutz Donnerhacke
- ALAC Observers: Chokri Ben Romdhane, Hans Bathija, K Mohan Raidu, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
Additional Resources |