This wiki page encapsulates the review team's requests for information and briefings and answers associated with them.
Plenary Requests
Written Implementation Briefing Request | Status | Link (also available on background materials page) |
---|---|---|
WHOIS1 - Rec 1 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Rec 2 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Rec 3 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Rec 4 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Recs 5-9 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Rec 10 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Rec 11 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Recs 12-14 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 - Recs 15-16 | ![]() | here |
WHOIS1 Implementation Assessment Subgroups
Subgroup | Request | Status | Link (also available on subgroups' pages) |
---|---|---|---|
Written materials: * Information on incentivization measures for ICANN Org staff including CEO ([standard] contract clauses, internal guidance, memos, meeting minutes etc.) | ![]() | ||
Questions: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-stratpriority/2018-March/000024.html | ![]() | ||
Brussels face-to-face meeting #3 - requests for clarification pertaining to the BWG-RDS | ![]() | ||
WHOIS1 Rec #3: Outreach | Question: What has ICANN done, on a one-time basis or ongoing, to address the requirement to reach out to communities outside of ICANN with an interest in WHOIS issues. | ![]() | |
Meeting with ICANN org compliance | ![]() |
| |
Meeting with ICANN org compliance | ![]() | ||
Brussels meeting follow-up questions to ICANN Compliance: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rec4-compliance/2018-April/000050.html | ![]() | ||
Additional questions to ICANN org: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rec4-compliance/2018-June/000065.html | ![]() | ||
Additional questions to ICANN org: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/2018-July/000762.html | ![]() | ||
Question: What are the process and criteria used to determine the domain names to review with ARS? | ![]() | ||
Question: For domains rechecked after suspension, what % are found to be unsuspended in total and the % that are still non-compliant? | ![]() | ||
WHOIS1 Rec #5-9: Data Accuracy | Questions: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-dataaccuracy/2018-March/000032.html | ![]() |
|
Brussels meeting follow-up questions to ICANN Compliance: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-dataaccuracy/2018-April/000041.html | ![]() | ||
Is there a routine feedback process in place for Compliance to advise the ARS project of ARS-detected inaccuracies that were not ultimately found by Compliance to be inaccuracies (e.g., tickets generated because the state was missing in a country where states are not applicable)? | ![]() | ||
Does ARS have access to non-public data under the Temporary Specification? Is the WHOIS data that is sampled by ARS obtained from the Registrar or Registry (for thick TLDs, since under GDPR much contact data may be redacted?) | ![]() | ||
WHOIS1 Rec #10: Privacy/Proxy Services | Metrics for P/P Spec in the 2013 RAA | ![]() | |
Briefing with ICANN Org staff leading the IRT staff support to learn how team will ramp up to manage PPSAI policy compliance | ![]() | ||
WHOIS1 Rec #11: Common Interface | Briefing on query failures on WHOIS microsite - how frequent, cause, any efforts to alleviate. The subgroup would like to gather statistics (current) on use of the common interface, uptime, requests for help using the tool and what usage data is tracked by ICANN. In addition, it is seeking information on challenges encountered. | ![]() | Link |
Requests for clarification regarding operating plan and annual report | ![]() | Link |
New Assessment Subgroups
Subgroup | Request | Status | Link |
---|---|---|---|
Subgroup 2 - Anything New | On AWIP and ERRP, what does compliance audit for these policies, and what compliance issues has compliance encountered | ![]() | Link |
Subgroup 5 – Safeguarding Registrant Data | ICANN org to provide links to materials describing process for transfer of data to escrow providers | ![]() | Link |
Contract signed with escrow providers so that we may understand what processes, constraints or rules escrow providers are subject to regarding safeguarding data while under their custody and in relation to any data breaches that may be discovered. If the contracts are all substantially identical, then the standard boiler-plate contract will be sufficient. | ![]() | Link |