Date: Monday, 16 November 2020
Time: 23:00 UTC (for the time in various time zones click here)
Meeting Number: AL.LAC/MT.0323/1
How can I participate in this meeting?
¿Cómo se puede participar en la teleconferencia?
English Conference ID = 1638
Spanish Conference ID = 1738
Portuguese Conference ID = 5393
French Conference ID = 1838
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/94442498235?pwd=ZkZselllbXNSTG4zOSt0TkpuckYzQT09 / Password: LAC-Mont11
Action Items: EN/ES
Recording: EN, ES, PT, FR
Zoom Chat: EN/ES
Zoom Recording: ES
Participants:
ES: Augusto Ho, Harold Arcos, Pablo Rodriguez, Carlos Dionisio Aguirre, Vanda Scartezini, Alfredo Lopez, Raitme Citterio, Alberto Soto, Maritza Aguero, Anahi Menendez-Ruiz, Adrian Carballo, Vrikson Acosta, Lilian Ivette De Luque, Lito Ibarra, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Gilberto Lara, Abdias Zambrano, Alejandro Pisanty,
EN:
FR: Sindy Obed,
PT: None
Apologies:
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Claudia Ruiz
Interpreters:
ES: Claudia and Marina
PT: Bettina and Esperanza
FR: Isabelle and Claire
Call Management: Claudia Ruiz
AGENDA ES
1. Roll Call - Staff (2 minutos)
2. Bienvenida – Augusto Ho (1 minuto)
3. Aprobación de la Agenda - Harold Arcos (2 minutos)
4. DNSSEC en América Latina y el Caribe (45min) - Dr. Pablo Rodríguez, Vicepresidente Ejecutivo NIC .PR - Puerto Rico
5. Comentarios ALAC Member – Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez (7 minutos)
6. ALS Mobilization WP Report Cross-RALO – Vanda Scartezini (15 min)
7. Herramientas de Participación – Harold Arcos (7 min)
8. Actualización Regional – Augusto Ho (8 min)
9. Encuesta de Evaluación del Webinar -Staff (5 mins)
10. Otros Temas.
AGENDA EN
1. Roll Call - Staff (2 minutes)
2. Welcome - Augusto Ho (1 minute)
3. Approval of the Agenda - Harold Arcos (2 minutes)
4. DNSSEC in Latin America and the Caribbean (45min) - Dr. Pablo Rodríguez, Executive Vice President NIC .PR - Puerto Rico
5. Comments ALAC Member - Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez (7 minutes)
6. ALS Mobilization WP Report Cross-RALO - Vanda Scartezini (15 min)
7. Participation Tools - Harold Arcos (7 min)
8. Regional Update - Augusto Ho (8 min)
9. Webinar Evaluation Survey - staff (5 mins)
10. Other Topics.
Actualizaciones de comentarios sobre políticas
Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC
Addendum to the ALAC Statement on EPDP (August 2020)
Although the ALAC and the BC, IPC, GAC and the SSAC each took a somewhat different approach to addressing their positions in respect to the report, the ALAC is in general agreement with the positions taken in the GAC, SSAC and BC/IPC statements. In particular, the ALAC appreciates the in-depth and insightful analysis provided by the GAC, SSAC and BC/IPC.
Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps
The At-Large community is pleased to follow up on its prior ALAC statements regarding ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model (see: 13 June 2019, 14 October 2019, February 2020) with this ALAC statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model - Next Steps. The ALAC made recommendations on priority issues, moving out of silos, restoring recruitment and demographics, reviewing previous responses, identifying gaps, pandemic related issues and evaluation of success with respect to the latest Public Comment on the topic.
Final Report of the Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) on new gTLD Auction Proceeds
The ALAC appointed five Members to the CCWG and these Members, alongside several participants from At-Large, were very active contributors to the work of the CCWG. The ALAC believes that all of its concerns have been addressed and therefore was pleased to accept and ratify the Final Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group.
Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report
The ALAC strongly supports the limited and focused number of recommendations proposed by the ATRT3 report, reflecting the pending implementation of proposals from previous review teams. In moving forward, the ALAC advises the ICANN Board to: (1) Swiftly implement ATRT3 recommendation to evolve both specific and organizational reviews as per Section 8 of the final report; (2) Fully endorse the recommendation to enhance current methods of Prioritization and Rationalization of Activities, Policies, and Recommendations (as per Section 10 of the report); (3) Share the ATRT3 Review Team’s approach to the review process and methodology behind it, aiming to ensure that all elements contributing to achieving strategic objectives and their subcomponents are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-based (SMART) and that all reporting on these refers to well specified metrics, to be reviewed on a regular or timely basis (as per Section 9 of the report).
ALAC Statement on EPDP (July 2020)
A vast amount of work has been done, but the ALAC believes that if and when the SSAD is deployed, the probability of its meeting the goals needed by the communities whose efforts we support will be low. Therefore, in order for the ALAC to support the EPDP Final Report, the ALAC noted the following GNSO Council outcomes would be required:
- GNSO Council would agree that any Evolution Standing Committee recommendation on additional SSAD decision use-cases (that are in full accordance with the EPDP Policy Recommendation 9.3) will be treated as Implementation and not require further policy deliberations.
- Legal vs Natural, Accuracy, WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System and Anonymized contact email will be fully addressed with full participation in all aspects of discussions by the ICANN Advisory Committees that wish to participate. If these issues are deemed to be policy, they must be addressed by a group empowered to make policy recommendations, led by a qualified, non-conflicted chair. The GAC, ALAC and SSAC must be involved in setting the mandate or charter of such groups. The target for completion of all work should be no later than April 2021.
- The GNSO Council would agree that ratifying the Evolution Standing Committee recommendations will only require a GNSO Majority as currently called for in the GNSO Policy Manual.
- The GNSO Council would acknowledge that deliberations during implementation setting of prices for the SSAD must involve the future potential users of the SSAD and not only look at cost recovery but the actual ability and willingness of SSAD users to pay the prices being set.
Próximos Procedimientos de Comentarios Públicos
Comentarios Publicos para decision
Ninguno
Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)
Nombre del Comentario Público | Comentarios del Público Cerrar | Estado | Grupo de Trabajo Asignado | Autor(es) |
---|---|---|---|---|
| COMENTARIO | CPWG | Equipo de redacción voluntario(s): Justine Chew & Small Team: | |
| DRAFTING | CPWG | Equipo de redacción voluntario(s): |