Date: Wednesday, 14 April 2021                                   

Time: 20:00-21:00 UTC (For the time in various time zones click here)

Zoom room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/92092001688?pwd=RnViVkNaWURXOFhEcUkvcWtMR21QUT09

Password: (43ngmjw8e

Webinar ID: 920 9200 1688
Phone-only Passcode: 9908217612
International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/agzxFop23 [icann.zoom.us]

Interpretation available: Yes (ES & FR - Simultaneous)

AFRALO Abdulkarim Oloyede, Dave Kissoondoyal, Sarah Kiden

APRALO Holly Raiche, Justine Chew, Maureen Hilyard

EURALO Pari Esfandiari, Joanna Kulesza, Matthias M. Hudobnik

LACRALO Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez , Sindy Obed, Sylvia Herlein-Leite

NARALO Greg Shatan, Jonathan Zuck, Marita Moll 

Liaisons Andrei Kolesnikov(SSAC), Barrack Otieno  (ccNSO), Cheryl Langdon-Orr (GNSO), Yrjö Lansipuro (GAC)

Participants

EN: 

ES: 

FR: 

Apologies: 

Staff:

Interpreters 

ES: 

FR: 

Call management: Board Operations

Action items: EN

Recording: EN, ES, FR

Transcript: EN, ES, FR

Zoom chat: EN

Zoom Recording: EN

AGENDA 

Questions from the ALAC to the ICANN Board:

1. Currently, various activities are being rolled-out under Strategic Objective #2: Improve the effectiveness of ICANN's multistakeholder model of governance. Under this banner, we are interested in how we can work together to make sure the end user in ICANN's MS model is a visible and well-understood part of the process. We would also like to hear more about how the "understanding the global public interest" project will intersect with the work on the MS evolution.
2. We talk about a "holistic" review of ICANN with the potential outcome of significant changes in how we are organized and how we conduct business. There is certainly a lot of talk about this being an important step for ICANN. My sense is that EVERYONE wants to see significant change, but not in THEIR OWN area (NIMBY - Not In My Back Yard).

   1. Is such a review really possible, and if so, ho do we go about it?

3. With two Policy Development Processes currently reaching milestones that require Board action, namely the EPDP and the Subsequent Procedures PDP, there still appears to be divergence amongst the ICANN community on many sticky points. The ALAC has the ability to comment and provide Advice directly to the Board on both of these issues, and indeed, it has used this ability. Other advisory Committees also have the opportunity to provide Advice. However, when asked, the ICANN CEO has mentioned that according to the Bylaws, the only body that makes policy for Generic Top Level Domains is the GNSO. Yet, some matters clearly appear to be going around in circles. Forever!
   1. Is the Board willing to take into account the balance of all  stakeholders in ICANN? For example, prior to the last round of new gTLDs, the Board took steps to organise an ICANN key stakeholder meeting specifically to address new gTLDs with the GAC and other parties.
   2. On the contrary, is the ICANN Board now a rubber-stamping body?
   3. How does the Board plan to find a solution to deadlocks that get some topics to go in circles ad-infinitum? Or is it not for the Board to find a solution? After all, Board members have fiduciary duty.