Versions Compared

Version Old Version 8 New Version Current
Changes made by

Michelle DeSmyter

Aleksey Khapchenko

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Fix links.

...

Info

PROPOSED AGENDA

  1. Roll Call & SOI Updates

 

       2. Continued Substantive Review of Priority 1 (SSAD) Legal Questions Submitted to Date


           a) Substantive review of SSAD questions (beginning where LC left off during last LC meeting)

  • Updated Question 11                                  - Team to review Brian, Margie, Thomas, and Volker’s updated proposal for Q11.


  • Updated Google Right to be Forgotten Question

                                        - Following the Team’s review of the Google Right to be Forgotten case, does the Committee believe a question to outside counsel is necessary?


          b) Agree on next steps


     3. Legal Committee Sign-off on legal memos

 


 

    4. Begin review of Priority 2 Legal Questions – WHOIS Accuracy and City Field Redaction

 

         a) Substantive review of Priority 2 Legal Questions for WHOIS Accuracy and City Field Redaction

         b) Agree on next steps

 

    5. Wrap and confirm next meeting to be scheduled

         a) Confirm action items

         b) The next Legal Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, 3 December at 15:00 UTC.


BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS



Info
titleRECORDINGS

Audio Recording

Zoom Recording

Chat Transcript


Tip
titlePARTICIPATION

Attendance 

Apologies: Tara Whalen Whalen (SSAC)

Alternates:  Stephanie Perrin (NCSG -partial meeting/ Tatiana Tropina)


Note

Notes/ Action Items

  1. Thomas to add a footnote to Q11, scenario 1, inquiring whether the outlined approach is unnecessarily conservative by Friday, 22 November.
  2. Legal Committee to review the recently-published Guidelines on Territorial Scope from the European Data Protection Board. Following review of the guidelines, Legal Committee members who believe this warrants further discussion to outline the outstanding issue(s) to the list.
  3. Matthew to clarify in the executive summary for questions 1/2, specifically noting that the Team is summarizing the advice Bird & Bird returned based on the specific scenarios provided to them by Wednesday, 20 November.
  4. Matthew to edit the executive summary for question 3, taking into account the discussion of legal effect by Wednesday, 20 November.
  5. Brian to propose a new WHOIS accuracy question, regarding the significant effects of processing WHOIS data vs. the effort taken to ensure its accuracy by Tuesday, 26 November.
  6. Laureen to review GAC-proposed questions for WHOIS accuracy and provide a rationale within the appropriate column in the worksheet.
  7. In advance of the next call on Tuesday, 3 December, Legal Committee to review Priority 2 questions for all remaining topics (all but WHOIS accuracy and City Field Redaction) submitted by their SO/AC/SG and determine whether or not they remain relevant and, if so, draft a short rationale in the respective worksheet. Please find a link to the Priority 2 Worksheets. Please note that within each worksheet, Support Staff has indicated who is responsible for adding a rationale to each question. 


The next Legal Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, 3 December at 15:00 UTC.