Content Comparison

Questions 

...

Proposed Table of Contents:

1. Introduction

Short intro with all the bells & whistles thanking the conference organisers for accepting the contribution.
Also -- an explanation that this contribution was written in a completely bottom-up multi-stakeholder way involving all of ICANN's communities.

2. Definitions of the terms we are using

In this section we provide definitions of terms we are going to use in our arguments, so as to avoid any ambiguity which would bring a frivolous discussion in Brazil or generate a misunderstanding which could be used by people wishing to attack the accuracy of our submission

3. Arguments (place-holder name, please suggest another name than this)

These are the explanation of the point of view of this community. Please draft those as punchy and concise as possible.
At the moment we are all working in small groups in order to draft those arguments. You'll notice that some are technical in nature (the single root) whilst others are more "internet governance".

I suggest two sub-sections:

3.1 Technical arguments
3.2 Internet Governance arguments

4. Roadmap Contributions

This is the part of the Brazil meeting which wishes to design a Roadmap for further evolution of the Internet Governance ecosystem. Whilst in sections 2 and 3, we are merely stating fact which I believe we can all agree to pretty quickly (since it is drafted by the best experts in ICANN: you), Section 4 is going to be a much harder piece of work because:
a. we might not agree with each other
b. we have so little time to discuss it

So let me fire the first shot: what does one mean by a Roadmap? Well, you can bet ICANN's going to be in the firing line for this and Internationalisation of ICANN, including the IANA function is going to be a really hot topic in Brazil. You can already see the European Commission warming up on this. You know Brazil's also hot. And that's nothing compared with some other contributions which we've heard at WCIT over a year ago.

SO -- what's this community ready to propose in the Roadmap?

5. Conclusions

A very short conclusion // I would shy away from repeating the content in the body of the contribution but would make use of this paragraph to emphasize our overall message. I'd suggest something very punchy here.

Definitions

Instructions

We've seen that definitions are really important so we are all on the same page, and so that anyone reading the input from this WG will also be clear as to what the contribution alludes to.

...

...